On Mon 21 Jun 2010, 15:29 Phil Holmes wrote: > >>Just remove the /pageBreak in the middle of your score and it works > >>perfectly. > >Yes, almost .) > > > >(I can use both system-count and page-count, replace \pageBreak with > >\break, then adjust spacing to force three-systems-per-page desired > >layout, with ragged-bottom=##t --- of course! Now i can see. Thank You.) > > > >I've found issue 884, but here is something different --- here lilypond > >can not produce anything, because of confusing \pageBreak. Well, if i > >could provide tiny example, i would add issue titled "\pageBreak > >confuses layout engine *far* too much"... But i can not, i guess. > >I will try .) > > > >Oh well. > > > >>HTH, > >> > >>Carl > > > >-- > > Dmytro O. Redchuk > > So I'm going to break Graham's Bug Squad rule again here, and ask a > question. As far as I can see, this shows a critical bug. It may > be complex as a bit of Lilypond, but surely something that compiles > and displays perfectly under 2.12 should do the same under 2.13? > This bit of code runs fine with the \pageBreak in 2.12 and crashes > with no output and lots of programming errors in 2.13.24-2. I do believe this is somewhat related to 884: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=884
I'll try to check today .) > -- > Phil Holmes > Bug Squad -- Dmytro O. Redchuk Bug Squad _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
