On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:08 PM, James Bailey
<derhindem...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, lilypond doesn't care about your opinion. You end a hairpin,
> and then at some later point in time start a new one. Lilypond is just a
> dumb program, it doesn't care if it's only a 16th note later or 200 measures
> later, one is ended before the next is begun, therefore, they are no longer
> related.

I could imagine a way of making LilyPond aware of nearly-adjacent
dynamics. Something like a 'neighborhood property, that would take a
ly:moment as argument... If anyone else wants to help write a feature
request, I'll add it to the tracker.

(Oh, and for that feature request to be valid, it would need to be
documented with a scanned example of course.)

Cheers,
Valentin.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to