On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:08 PM, James Bailey <derhindem...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Unfortunately, lilypond doesn't care about your opinion. You end a hairpin, > and then at some later point in time start a new one. Lilypond is just a > dumb program, it doesn't care if it's only a 16th note later or 200 measures > later, one is ended before the next is begun, therefore, they are no longer > related.
I could imagine a way of making LilyPond aware of nearly-adjacent dynamics. Something like a 'neighborhood property, that would take a ly:moment as argument... If anyone else wants to help write a feature request, I'll add it to the tracker. (Oh, and for that feature request to be valid, it would need to be documented with a scanned example of course.) Cheers, Valentin. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user