On 7 Dec 2011, at 20:38, Matthew Collett wrote: > It does seem odd that LilyPond currently has no standard paths for > installation-specific includes: I would have expected at least one > system-wide one (somewhere in /usr/local or /usr/share on a generic UNIX, ...
It should be in /usr/local/ -- the stuff in /usr/ without that belongs to the system installation, and should normally not be changed. OS X 10.7 knows the difference, so that /usr/local/ is copied over when importing files from a backup. And include/ is for system specific files, whereas share/ is for system independent files. So both might be used. Candidates /usr/local/include/lilypond/ /use/local/share/lilypond/ or something. > somewhere in /Library on OS X) and one user-specific one (somewhere in > ~/Library on OS X). I think of this as the application version of ~/.<name> files. In OS X 10.7, ~/Library is invisible in the GUI. Hans _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
