Am 10.04.2012 08:37, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Helge Kruse<helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net> wrote:
What is the benefit of the two voices approach and when should I avoid the
stem up/down?
It's not a matter of benefits - using stemUp/Down instead of
voiceOne/Two/.. simply produces typographically wrong results:
stemUp/Down only changes the direction of stems, while the direction
of ties, slurs, articulations, dots, positioning of rests etc. should
be changed, too.
I can't contradict this statement. But sometimes I don't find a way to
place the notes without stemUp/Down like in this example:
\version "2.14.2"
\context PianoStaff <<
\context Staff=right \relative c'' {
\key g \major \time 3/4
s2.
\times 4/6 {r16 b cis d[ cis b]} \times 4/6 {r16 cis d e[ d cis]}
d a fis d | % 40
}
\context Staff=left \relative c' {
\clef bass \key g \major \time 3/4
c4 d e |
\change Staff=right g4 a \change Staff=left fis | % 40
}
>>
The left hand plays the two quavers (g and a). The semiquaver rests
belong to the right hand's voice. Therefore I want to quavers shown
below the rests. But the notes in the sextuplet should keep the stems
down to avoid a high skyline.
I played around with voiceOne/Two but found no solution. Probably you
have a one?
Threre was a change in the documentation to underline this difference,
but apparently it's not enough. Maybe you could suggest what we
should do to make this issue clear for all users?
Honestly, I used the 2.13 documentation. Now I downloaded the 2.14
documentation. Searching for stemDown\Up\Neutral I didn't find any hint
to favor voiceOne/Two/Three. But I did not read thorough 763 pages.
Which section are you referring?
Regards,
Helge
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
