>> So, i still think that we shouldn't allow "c2 4 4" despite some >> really nice benefits it could bring us. > > Well, it won't affect previously valid programs. And it would have > some nice side effects, including > > c4~ | 1~ | 2. > > with or without bar checks or spaces, and reasonably straightforward > underpinnings and semantics.
So let's keep that as one of the first results of our GLISS discussion, together with your suggestions for improved syntax of \tempo. Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user