Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes:
>>> So, i still think that we shouldn't allow "c2 4 4" despite some
>>> really nice benefits it could bring us.
>>
>> Well, it won't affect previously valid programs. And it would have
>> some nice side effects, including
>>
>> c4~ | 1~ | 2.
>>
>> with or without bar checks or spaces, and reasonably straightforward
>> underpinnings and semantics.
>
> So let's keep that as one of the first results of our GLISS
> discussion, together with your suggestions for improved syntax of
> \tempo.
I think it has a somewhat reasonable chance of being implementable. It
would certainly take quite a bit of shaking out ambiguities, though.
Particularly in situations lacking context, like in #{ #} and on the
right side of assignments and as function argument it might prove hard
to get really satisfactorily consistent and understandable behavior.
And I don't want to introduce it myself before I get the whole function
call/identifier area to a state I consider a stable basis for further
work.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
