On 29/11/13 15:34, Janek Warchoł wrote:
What do you think about \at function that David wrote?
(see snippet here
https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/master/input-shorthands/articulations-not-aligned-with-notes)
The syntax is a bit awkward, but this function already does exactly
what we want: allows to insert dynamics and other things in the middle
of the note's duration. I think it's very nice.
Not familiar with it. Will check it out and see how it goes -- thanks! :-)
Thanks to David's work on issue 3330
(http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3330) the spacing
between B and flat symbol is better since 2.17.19 (see attached). Of
course, the accidental still has wrong size and baseline - i think i
could handle that by creating special versions of accidentals for use
with text (see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-09/msg00353.html).
Would you like to sponsor this? For $20 i could add special
accidentals to LilyPond font and adjust \flat, \sharp and \natural
commands to use them (and maybe others like \semiflat, if i'll have
time).
Yup, sure. How do I go about sending you the money?
Actually, I wonder if rather than special glyphs, it might be better to have a
function like \pitchText which takes a Lilypond pitch and transforms it into an
optimized textual form: so e.g. \pitchText{bf} or \pitchText{fs} or whatever.
(I'm using English note-names here.)
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
