Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2014-05-18 12:28 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>:
>> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> 2014-05-18 7:20 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>:
>>>> Knute Snortum <ksnor...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> My situation is I need to transcribe a crescendo starting without a
>>>>> dynamic
>>>>> marking. If I put in a \mf then I don't get warning. If I can hide the
>>>>> dynamic mark, all will be fine. Is there a \hide syntax that will work?
>>>
>>> Omitting the DynamicText.stencil will not cause the Hairpin to start as
>>> usual.
>>> Resetting the parent of the Hairpin my work:
>>>
>>> \version "2.18.0"
>>>
>>> \score
>>> {
>>> {
>>> \once \override Hairpin.after-line-breaking =
>>> #(lambda (grob)
>>> (let ((dyn-txt (ly:spanner-bound grob LEFT)))
>>> (ly:grob-set-property! dyn-txt 'stencil #f)
>>> (ly:spanner-set-bound! grob LEFT (ly:grob-parent dyn-txt X))))
>>> c'1\mf\> c' c'\!
>>> }
>>> \layout {}
>>> \midi {}
>>> }
>>
>> If \omit is too strong and \hide leaves too much space, maybe overriding
>> the stencil with point-stencil will work?
>
> Using point-stencil doesn't work either.
>
> \version "2.18.0"
>
> \score
> {
> {
> \override DynamicText.stencil = #point-stencil
> c'1\mf\> c' c'\!
> }
> \layout {}
> \midi {}
> }
Ok, I'll bite: what does "doesn't work" mean? I see the same results
for overriding with point-stencil and omitting, and those results are
a) without error message
b) looking as expected when compared to the version with visible \mf
Either way, I find the stopping position of the hairpin somewhat
strange/early, but it is exactly the same as it would be without
override.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
