Am 14.07.2014 10:55, schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de> writes:There was some discussion about making the interface more user-friendly and allow for aliases, but there is no final consensus yet IIRC. Moreover, the problem with repeat sections, for example c4 c c c \bar "||" \break \repeat volta 2 { d4 d d d } was not covered at all yet.That would imply that having a single bar type for pre-/post-/no-break might not wholly cut it. Instead we might need to differentiate pre- and post-break and provide recipes/kerns to construct the no-break variant somewhat reliably.
+1 Casting this into a usable interface seems not to be a trivial task. Marc _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
