Am 06.03.2015 15:22, schrieb David Nalesnik:


On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:20 AM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com <mailto:david.nales...@gmail.com>> wrote:



    On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org
    <mailto:u...@openlilylib.org>> wrote:


        Thanks.
        And for completeness I also add another (contrived) example
        image of the whole thing. Small quiz: Who recognizes what this
        is historically? ;-)


    Well, I recognize the arsis and thesis and the Hauptstimme
    designation--which all identify this as something from
    Schoenberg.  An analysis?  One of the last works before
    atonality?  A later arrangement?


And of course you did say "contrived".  A zero for reading comprehension!


Yes, but my wording was quite misleading.
The musical example is contrived, what I was after is the Viennese School notation stuff. So you hit jackpot :-)

--
Urs Liska
u...@openlilylib.org

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to