On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote:
> Am 06.03.2015 15:22, schrieb David Nalesnik: > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:20 AM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thanks. >>> And for completeness I also add another (contrived) example image of the >>> whole thing. Small quiz: Who recognizes what this is historically? ;-) >>> >>> >> Well, I recognize the arsis and thesis and the Hauptstimme >> designation--which all identify this as something from Schoenberg. An >> analysis? One of the last works before atonality? A later arrangement? >> >> > And of course you did say "contrived". A zero for reading comprehension! > > > > Yes, but my wording was quite misleading. > The musical example is contrived, what I was after is the Viennese School > notation stuff. So you hit jackpot :-) > > Aha! Good--I was going to rack my brains over whether this is a familiar quotation I should recognize, presented in an unusual way!
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
