On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:53 PM, James Westby <james.wes...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:55:31 +0000, Dave Martin <dave.mar...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> So far, so good, but we still don't shapshort linaro-image-tools along >> with releases. >> >> This will become a problem because l-i-t evolves over time -- I've >> already had to start explaining to people how to check out old >> versions of l-i-t in order to make use of the linaro-m release images. >> Installing the (unsupported) linaro-m release for panda doesn't work >> with current l-i-t, for example. > > I would consider this a bug. I think it is impractical for us to ask > everyone to use a different l-i-t for every release that they consume. > > I also think it would be a massive headache for maintainence of l-i-t as > well. > > Please file bugs when you see these issues, and we will deal with them > appropriately.
OK I'll try to reproduce it--- but unless we test every l-m-c with all old releases, surely we're going to get regressions over time? Cheers ---Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
