On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Dave Martin <dave.mar...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:53 PM, James Westby > <james.wes...@canonical.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:55:31 +0000, Dave Martin <dave.mar...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >>> So far, so good, but we still don't shapshort linaro-image-tools along >>> with releases. >>> >>> This will become a problem because l-i-t evolves over time -- I've >>> already had to start explaining to people how to check out old >>> versions of l-i-t in order to make use of the linaro-m release images. >>> Installing the (unsupported) linaro-m release for panda doesn't work >>> with current l-i-t, for example. >> >> I would consider this a bug. I think it is impractical for us to ask >> everyone to use a different l-i-t for every release that they consume. >> >> I also think it would be a massive headache for maintainence of l-i-t as >> well. >> >> Please file bugs when you see these issues, and we will deal with them >> appropriately. > > OK I'll try to reproduce it--- but unless we test every l-m-c with all > old releases, surely we're going to get regressions over time?
Seems to be reproducible. Bug raised here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools/+bug/720114 ---Dave _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
