On 6 October 2011 17:34, Christian Robottom Reis <k...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 09:07:19AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote: >> > What are we using to measure these improvements? What is the -turbo >> > lib being used for? >> >> We use tjbench to measure the improvements. The browsers >> (firefox/chromium) is a use case mentioned on the roadmap but I didn't >> have seen any results. Tom knows more. >> >> >> Debian/Ubuntu P are going to move to libjpeg8 by default making >> >> current package obsolete in the future. >> > >> > Note that when we asked Darrell about this he questioned the performance >> > benefits of version 8. Mans probably knows more. At any rate, -turbo as >> > an upstream is the only sane decision. >> > >> > Who is making the choice from the Ubuntu side -- and is there a bug open >> > for this? >> >> Bill Allombert is libjpeg Debian maintainer. At the moment, Ubuntu is >> following Debian. There isn't any bug open as the transition didn't >> started yet. > > I think Tom and Ricardo should probably talk to Bill about it; I see > this as being a very questionable move. I'd much rather move to seeing > libjpeg deprecated into a libjpeg-legacy-8b package for good and -turbo > become the actual system version.
<Debian hat> I own the ITP on Debian and already talk to Bill about our plans with ljt. </Debian hat> _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
