Agree with Stephanie and actually the federal grant that helped purchase Mt
Misery was for passive recreation and included dog walking as an activity.

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 2:00 PM Stephanie Smoot <stephanieesm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Well, it depends who you ask.  For dog walkers, we are very "welcoming and
> open minded" .   The cyclists are late to the table.
>
> Seriously, its about bikes on dirt trails essentially changing the nature
> of the trails from passive enjoyment (a quiet walk in the woods) to more
> active type of recreation (cycling).  If you give cycling to some of the
> trails, other more passive users will drop off.
>
> Regards,
> *Stephanie Smoot*
>
> 857 368-9175  work
> 781 941-6842  personal cell
> *617 595-5217 *work cell
> 126 Chestnut Circle
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/126+Chestnut+Circle+Lincoln,+MA+01773?entry=gmail&source=g>
> Lincoln, MA 01773
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/126+Chestnut+Circle+Lincoln,+MA+01773?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>  Virus-free.
> www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_-5661894444988580906_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 4:45 PM John Mendelson <johntmendel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I must point out that both Concord and Weston (and other towns mentioned)
>> allow cycling on a significant majority of their trails at present.  We are
>> very much our of step with our peer towns in terms of restricting usage of
>> our trails.  And these policies give us a reputation, deserved or
>> otherwise, of a town that is the opposite of welcoming and open-minded.  We
>> are an island of exclusion when it comes to trail use policy in the area.
>>
>> Further, there are many trail bike specific destinations in the area that
>> attract enthusiasts and an incremental increase in bike access here will
>> not significantly increase use nor impact wildlife.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022, 4:25 PM Barbara Peskin <bpeski...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Deb,
>>> Thank you for sharing the zoom link and reminder for the 6/22 vote.
>>> Interest from Lexington, Wayland, Andover, etc seems to be a sign of
>>> outside recreational bike groups looking to get access to Lincoln trails
>>> and I feel that the Conservation Commission's considering to lower the bar
>>> on protecting habitat will negatively impact Lincoln wildlife - I don't
>>> think Concord or Weston will in exchange protect trails if we open ours.
>>> Lincoln has something special because of the generosity of conservation and
>>> hard work of stewardship that came before us, and I wish it could continue.
>>> I am sending in another letter on behalf of walkers and wildlife before
>>> 6/22 and hope you might, too. If you are interested in seeing my letter
>>> please let me know.
>>>
>>>
>>> Re: Trails Continuance from Lincoln Digest, Vol 117, Issue 20
>>>
>>> Hello, all -
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The June 1 ConComm trails discussion over Zoom was robust and
>>> heartening; lots of people showed up and voiced their opinions on the
>>> proposed trails regulations.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For those who couldn't make it, the ConComm decided to hold off on
>>> voting on the regs, and instead to continue the meeting on the evening of
>>> this Wednesday, June 22, also over Zoom. You can find the agenda for that
>>> meeting here:
>>> https://www.lincolntown.org/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_06222022-4573
>>>
>>> Further discussion and a vote on the trails issue is scheduled for 8:15
>>> pm, and the Zoom link for the meeting is on the agenda, or here:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Zoom Meeting Link:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88063247875?pwd=SFJFd1pKcVJZSDFXUDkxdGVyYzBQZz09
>>>
>>> or Dial In: 1-646-876-9923
>>>
>>> Meeting ID: 880 6324 7875 Passcode: 894034
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Written comments on the proposed draft trails policy are a matter of
>>> public record; Michelle Grzenda suggested that anyone interested in reading
>>> those comments should call or email her or Stacy Carter for the link. (The
>>> Conservation Dept. prefers to get individual requests for the link rather
>>> than broadcasting it, because private emails are included with the
>>> comments).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have read the comments, and think they’re worth the read, as they give
>>> a wide range of opinions on trail use in Lincoln. (I noticed that some
>>> quite extensive comments came from residents of Lexington, Wayland, Weston,
>>> Concord, Belmont and Andover — there’s quite a lot of interest outside
>>> Lincoln in Lincoln’s trail policies.) And of course it’s always good to
>>> hear the voices and views of others on the ConComm Zoom, and to voice your
>>> own.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Deb Howe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Barbara Peskin
>>>
>>> *My Moments in Nature Photo Gallery: barbarapeskin.com
>>> <http://barbarapeskin.com>*
>>> --
>>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>>> Browse the archives at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>>> Change your subscription settings at
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>>
>>> --
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>> Browse the archives at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>>
>> --
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Barbara Peskin

*My Moments in Nature Photo Gallery: barbarapeskin.com
<http://barbarapeskin.com>*
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to