There was no mention of not making every effort to comply. It is how we approach that effort, and whether we expose wetlands to setbacks different than our current bylaw of 100’.
It is a huge leap of faith to include one of the most critical areas under consideration for HCA zoning-the mall. We have been told that there will be a shrinkage in retail, and no guarantee it will be there in years to come. We have been told there will plans produced. I would like to see how those plans will be brought to life/guaranteed, before I vote for rezoning. We have been told to trust I have always operated under the principle of “trust, but verify.” I want verification before I vote. There are many ways to add housing and comply in a timely fashion. And, listening to the Planning. Board meeting of the other night, it sounds like some of those housing is coming sooner, rather than later. So, it is not s”simply a zoning exercise.” Can you answer the question about wetlands setbacks? Can we maintain our 100 'set backs in HCA zoned areas?” If we cannot answer that, I will want to take a close look at the various options proposals that include proximity to wetlands. Also, can you please let us know about the timing of replacement of water mains, and the cost? Do we have any information on the size of grants that have been made to towns like ours for such projects? This is important as we are looking at being asked to vote for a Community Center where we pay 100% of the costs-$15-28 million. Knowing how much additional debt we might assume to pay for all or some portion of a water main would help in decision-making on that vote. All this would contribute to our understanding of the big picture. Thank you. ------ Sara Mattes > On Nov 22, 2023, at 5:46 PM, Rich Rosenbaum <s...@bcdef.com> wrote: > > > It’s a little like asking us to make a YUGE leap of faith. > > An alternative would be to take a different leap of faith that none of the > following happen: > > - we end up delaying so much that we miss the deadline for complying > - we no longer qualify for state funding for needed repairs and replacement > of our past-the-expiration-date water mains > - we end up with a bond to pay for a very, very large bill to keep clean > water flowing to our faucets > > Rich > (speaking as a citizen of Lincoln) > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 5:01 PM Sara Mattes <samat...@gmail.com > <mailto:samat...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Amen. >> It’s a little like asking us to make a YUGE leap of faith. >> It makes the argument that we should proceed with extreme caution and not >> make any changes where these questions might come into play, esp. a >> challenge to our wetlands bylaw. >> >> >> ------ >> Sara Mattes >> >>
-- The LincolnTalk mailing list. To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org. Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
