So, the upshot is: no class variabes.
That sucks. But whatever...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Christopher Watson
Sr. Software Engineer
Lightspan, Inc.
http://www.lightspan.com/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Griffiths [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:25 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: <lingo-l> Re: Static Variables
Close enough I guess, but not the same. By using the
goofiness below the
property can be accessed through the me instance of the
script and through
the script. That would be like accessing a static through
this and through
scope resolution. IMHO that doesn't make much sense, but
whatever...
Patrick
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
