Is Authorware not better for Quizzes.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Pekka Buttler
Sent: 20 June 2001 09:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: <lingo-l> authorware vs director - training packages
Honestly, I do not think AW is good for anything. Depending on what you do,
I'd rather suggest Director or even flash.
Pekka
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Elvin M. Certeza, Jr.
> Sent: 18. kesdkuuta 2001 2:25
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: <lingo-l> authorware vs director - training packages
>
>
> as the subject header, authorware vs director in usage for training
> packages. which one would be better to use?
>
> i know a lot of companies who uses authorware for their training packages
> and stuff and director on something else? Does this mean that
> authorware is
> convenient for using packages?
>
> thanks all!
>
>
>
> [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
> http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
> email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
>
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
