I've worked with both (Authorware & Director)
& I agree w/Pekka.
Authorware's strong suit is that it keeps score of tons of stuff
under the hood automatically.
Director can keep score too, but have to set up the variables.
Not that this is hard, but it's not done for you.
More importantly for me, is the authoring & user experiences.
Authorware is not known for fun.
Director is.
that's why I work with Director and never want to touch AW again.
-Buzz
At 9:24 AM +1000 6/18/01, Elvin M. Certeza, Jr. wrote:
>as the subject header, authorware vs director in usage for training
>packages. which one would be better to use?
>
>i know a lot of companies who uses authorware for their training packages
>and stuff and director on something else? Does this mean that authorware is
>convenient for using packages?
>
>thanks all!
>
>
>
>[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
>http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
>email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
