Daniel, tho it is surely enticing to post the same question to a lot of lists, it is generally better "form" to post one & wait to see if you get any responses. at the very least put a X-Post in the subject. I made some suggestions on Direct-L. Al Hospers CamberSoft, Inc. al<at>CamberSoft<dot>com http://www.cambersoft.com Shockwave and Director development, Lingo programming, CGI scripting. A famous linguist once said: "There is no language wherein a double positive can form a negative." YEAH, RIGHT [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor ac... Al Hospers
- <lingo-l> pacth Daniel Campos
- RE: <lingo-l> pacth Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> pacth Al Hospers
- Re: <lingo-l> pacth Daniel Campos
- RE: <lingo-l> pacth Colin Kettenacker
- RE: <lingo-l> pacth Al Hospers
- <lingo-l> I SEARCHED THE... the nightboy
- Re: <lingo-l> I SEARCHED... Buzz Kettles
- RE: <lingo-l> I SEARCHED... Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancest... Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Colin Kettenacker
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Mark A. Boyd
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- Re: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Christian Wach
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Colin Kettenacker
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor ac... Al Hospers
- Re: <lingo-l> OOP and ancest... Luke Wigley
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access pranavn
- Re: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Brennan Young
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Colin Kettenacker