I have looked into this, but from a z/VM standpoint.  I had to table it
until I got some other things cleaned up.  If interest is high, I will move
it closer to the edge of the table and it might fall off sooner.  ;-)

What I had planned was this...

Port portions of the e2fsprogs distro, mainly the ext2fs library
Provide the necessary lowlevel I/O routines
Create simple command line utes like "ls", "cp", "chmod", and such to access
the filesystem
Ultimately, create a Rexx function package to directly access the file
system

Any suggestions, comments, rants?

Leland


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Possible enhancement idea for dasdfmt
>
>
> This tidbit is one of the things I list as "missing" in my Linux/390
> presentations.  I think read-only access to an ext2/ext3/reiserfs file
> system from z/OS and z/VM would be a Good Thing[tm].
>
>
> Mark Post
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kern, Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Possible enhancement idea for dasdfmt
>
>
> Actually, it would be nice to have an OS/390 program that
> could READ a Linux
> filesystem. There is a fair amount of data collection I could
> do using our
> Apache/PHP webservers. Then instead of another FTP type
> process to move the
> data to OS/390 for inclusion in larger databases, the database update
> process could read the data directly from the Linux DASD.
>
> /Thomas Kern
> /301-903-2211
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 09:14
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Possible enhancement idea for dasdfmt
> >
> > (snipped...)
> >
> > So, I guess it is no longer needed by me. Unless somebody is
> > crazy enough to
> > want to create an OS/390 program which could directly read /
> > write a Linux
> > filesystem. Not that I'm advocating doing this. But it is an
> > interesting
> > thought to me.
>

Reply via email to