On Wednesday, 12/06/2006 at 01:13 CET, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I must admit I lost interest in this thread when we got into the the > "Linux can not" game while zSeries technology at least allows some > operating systems to make sense out of it. > > Certainly the need to recognize a disk from its volser rather than the > device address stems from the days of removable disk packs. You could > not address data by device address. > These days we have DASD subsystems with a lot of smartness and parity > bits. They will isolate the host from damage if they can. And they > will inform the host through architected means (i.e. EREP) when > uncorrectable errors are detected. When someone then decides to break > the mirror and vary the broken device offline, the volser will show up > at the other address where the OS should be able to find it.
But such also is the beauty of z/VM HyperSwap. If an RDEV goes bad, use the CP HYPERSWAP command to switch to the local mirror (PPRC). Systems Automation for Linux actually monitors *LOGREC looking for fatal event records, and HYPERSWAPs the disks if the primary starts to fail. The guest doesn't have to worry about switching to a different address. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390