Whew. There is this mystery I just discovered with /dev/disk/by-path....
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/dev/disk/by-path> ls -al total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 1 09:00 . drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 1 09:00 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0100 -> ../../dasda lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0100p1 -> ../../dasda1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0101 -> ../../dasdb lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0101p1 -> ../../dasdb1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0102 -> ../../dasdc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0102p1 -> ../../dasdc1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0103 -> ../../dasdd lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0103p1 -> ../../dasdd1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0104 -> ../../dasde lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0104p1 -> ../../dasde1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0105 -> ../../dasdf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0105p1 -> ../../dasdf1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8001 -> ../../dasdg lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8001p1 -> ../../dasdg1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8002 -> ../../dasdh lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8002p1 -> ../../dasdh1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8003 -> ../../dasdi lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8003p1 -> ../../dasdi1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8004 -> ../../dasdj lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8004p1 -> ../../dasdj1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8005 -> ../../dasdk lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8005p1 -> ../../dasdk1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8006 -> ../../dasdl lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8006p1 -> ../../dasdl1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8007 -> ../../dasdm lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8007p1 -> ../../dasdm1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8008 -> ../../dasdn lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8008p1 -> ../../dasdn1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8009 -> ../../dasdo lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8009p1 -> ../../dasdo1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800a -> ../../dasdp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800a1 -> ../../dasdp1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800b -> ../../dasdq lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800b1 -> ../../dasdq1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800c -> ../../dasdr lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800c1 -> ../../dasdr1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800d -> ../../dasds lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800d1 -> ../../dasds1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800e -> ../../dasdt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800e1 -> ../../dasdt1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800f -> ../../dasdu lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.800f1 -> ../../dasdu1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8010 -> ../../dasdz lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8010p1 -> ../../dasdz1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8011 -> ../../dasdaa lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.8011p1 -> ../../dasdaa1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.ff00 -> ../../dasdv lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.ff00p1 -> ../../dasdv1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.ff01 -> ../../dasdw lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.ff01p1 -> ../../dasdw1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.ff02 -> ../../dasdx lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.ff02p1 -> ../../dasdx1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.ff03 -> ../../dasdy lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.ff03p1 -> ../../dasdy1 Is there some reason why the 800a-800f disks don't result in 800ap1-800fp1? The p goes missing. Is this a bug? Marcy Cortes "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Post Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 9:11 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Finding /dev/disk/by-path >>> Marcy Cortes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/31/08 12:11 PM >>> >I'm pretty sure it's udev. Correct. Mark Post ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
