Shawn Wells píše v Po 24. 11. 2008 v 17:18 -0500:
> David Boyes wrote:
> > On 11/24/08 2:10 PM, "Mark Post" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>>> On 11/24/2008 at 1:14 PM, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >> -snip-
> >>
> >>> If you do this, please make sure there is a text-only version. Many people
> >>> don't install X at all on headless servers.
> >>>
> >> Pretty much by definition, GNOME Control Center is going to be GUI only.
> >> That
> >> was one of the things I appreciated in YaST when I was a customer. As
> >> ugly as
> >> it was, the ncurses version worked in any environment where the network was
> >> up.
> >>
> >
> > My point exactly. A X-only UI is not an significant improvement. There needs
> > to be a curses version as well as the X version.
> We also have to perform iterative development -- making things work
> together first, then presenting the GUI in differing ways. Should the
> Open Source community made tui/ncurses GUIs from the get go? Probably
> -- but we need to start somewhere.
>
The system-config* tools are being divided onto the backend (worker)
part and the frontend (GUI). So the TUI counterparts can concentrate on
implementing the UI only.
> If you were to request priority to be given to tui-izing the
> system-config* tools, what would the order be?
Dan
--
Dan Horák
Software Engineer, BaseOS
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99, 612 45 Brno
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
