No worries, Sir Rob - I seem to be especially cranky today.  Excellent paper
and explanation of relative share - and a much better answer then the
simplistic HELP explanation.  I'll refer to this in the future...  Thank
you!

Scott Rohling

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Rob van der Heij <
rvdh...@velocity-software.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Scott Rohling <scott.rohl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > My statements were based on the help for CP SET SHARE..  my comments on
> math
> > were somewhat tongue in cheek - but since this is a relative value - 100
> is
> > as good as any other to base things on..  set all your guests to 7 and
> use
> > increment of 3 if you like.   No idea at all by what you mean by
> 'political'
> > ..  and annoyed at the statement that the defaults are just flat out
> wrong.
>
> My apologies. One should not post on the mailing list while standing
> up or while in a hurry...
>
> You can't do VM performance with just the CP help files. I provided
> the link to the PDF that explains that it does not work the way you
> might think it should. The reason you see relative share like 100 and
> 200 is not for simple math or aesthetics, but to compensate for the
> fact that the allocated share is distributed over the virtual CPUs.
> The paper explains what the implications are when you don't play the
> game right.
>
> We're pushing the scheduler to its limits with workloads that are
> completely different from what it was designed for. It works as long
> as you don't do silly things or try to mislead the scheduler.
> Political tuning is when someone claims that VTAM is the most
> important thing in the system and recommends it should have REL 10000
> (or the z/OS sysprog insist that their OSA port should be "preferred
> route" even though he has no clue...)
>
> As for "wrong" - I thought that was beaten to death already. I buy an
> adult beverage for the first* who can explain why it makes sense to
> have the TCPIP stacks with a relative share 30 times higher than their
> Linux production guests.
>
> Rob
> --
> Rob van der Heij
> Velocity Software
> http://www.velocitysoftware.com/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
> visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
> http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

Reply via email to