>>>> On 3/14/2013 at 11:25 AM, Rick Troth <r...@casita.net> wrote:
>> THE ONLY time Linux actually *needs* CDL is when the disk will be
>> shared with MVS.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Mark Post <mp...@suse.com> wrote:
> Perhaps in a z/VM environment, but that's not completely true even there.
> The ability to create multiple partitions with CDL is very useful.

Short sighted.
The partitioning available in CDL is deceptive.

> Not _having_ to carve up specially sized minidisks
> saves a lot of human time and effort, and not wasting
> huge amounts of space in LPAR mode is very nice as well.

Specially sized minidisks are not the only option.  Think LVM.
If you're trying to get free from the battle of wasted space versus
wasted time and effort, logical volumes work really well.  Nothing
else in Linux land comes close.

If you're running on VM, you can and should consider using the CP
Directory to present specially sized minidisks.  That is, VM becomes
your logical volume manager.  You have *options*.  You have
flexibility way beyond what CDL offers and without the funky special
first track.

If your shop is better served by giving Linux guests large chunks (or
if you're doing LPAR where "large chunks" of DASD are the rule), feed
said large chunks to LVM and let LVM slice and dice ... and season to
taste.

This is not easy to say because I know I'm stepping on a developer's
toes.  Sorry.


--
-- R;   <><

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information on Linux on System z, visit
http://wiki.linuxvm.org/

Reply via email to