RE: Request for comments - Microwindows

[Greg Haerr]

On Monday, October 04, 1999 12:13 PM, Alan Cox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
: > which includes all of microwindows and all the enhancements
: > to mini-X, can be easily licensed this way.  But the nano-X
: > project has a large core of GrXXX routines that were originally
: > written by David Bell, and his license is completely unrestrictive,
: > except that his copyright notice must still be included.  So
: 
: His license doesnt clash with the LGPL. The LGPL doesnt allow you to
: remove other peoples copyright notices either
:
        So even though David Bell said "Permission is granted to use, distribute,
or modify this source, provided that this copyright notice remain intact" we
can say that now his code is subject to another agreement, the LGPL?
Doesn't the LGPL restrict more than the above?

Also, can we have a GPL license on the server and an LGPL license
on the applications?  Can we have both even if we allow linked-in
apps and client/server apps?