> So even though David Bell said "Permission is granted to use, distribute, > or modify this source, provided that this copyright notice remain intact" we > can say that now his code is subject to another agreement, the LGPL? > Doesn't the LGPL restrict more than the above? Yes. But that is allowed. You can take his work and use it as allowed by his license to create a derivative work - his license allows this. What you cannot do is stop someone taking David Bell's original work and using it under David Bell's license alone. The derivative work (the combination) is differently licensed to the original code he wrote. > Also, can we have a GPL license on the server and an LGPL license > on the applications? Can we have both even if we allow linked-in > apps and client/server apps? It gets complicated in the linked in case. Alan
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Jakob Eriksson
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alan Cox
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Jamie Howard
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Vidar Hokstad
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Greg Haerr
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Alan Cox
- RE: Request for comments - Microwindows Greg Haerr
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Vidar Hokstad
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alan Cox
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindows Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Microwindow... Alex Holden
- Re: Request for comments - Microw... Bradley D. LaRonde
- Re: Request for comments - Mi... Alex Holden