Linux-Advocacy Digest #173, Volume #28 Wed, 2 Aug 00 06:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was: Microsoft
Ruling Too Harsh
Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: A funny thing about Windoze networking (if you can really call it (gLiTcH)
Re: If Microsoft starts renting apps (gLiTcH)
Re: If Microsoft starts renting apps (gLiTcH)
Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark ("Stuart Fox")
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was: Microsoft
Ruling Too Harsh
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was: Microsoft
Ruling Too Harsh
Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It? (Dale Lakes)
Re: How Can I contribute? (V'rgo Vardja)
Re: Aaron Kulkis -- USELESS Idiot -- And His "Enemies" -was- Another one of
Lenin's Useful Idiots denies reality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was:
Microsoft Ruling Too Harsh
Date: 2 Aug 2000 05:12:13 -0400
Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed this unto the Network:
>Loren Petrich wrote:
>>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>
>> Mr. Kulkis now claims that employers are something other than
>> paragons of virtue, society's only legitimate rulers. Hmmm...
>I never claimed such a thing. The reason I go with Libertarian
>philosophy is because it holds that anyone is free to open a business,
>with little or no requirements for governmental approval (i.e. no
>requirement that a businessman go around being an ass-kisser to
>fiefdom-building bureaucrats) and SUCKY BUSINESSMEN WILL BE ALLOWED
>TO FAIL!
So you believe that the world is or should be for businessmen and
businessmen ONLY?
--
SPELL.DLL carrup't. Yoosing PALMER.DLL instedd.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 05:15:59 -0400
Ed Cogburn wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> >
> > What would be far fairest of all would be if everyone paid the same
> > DOLLAR AMOUNT in taxes, REGARDLESS of income.
>
> Everyone paying the same dollar amount would require the gov to
> drastically raise the taxes just to get the same amount of revenue it
> gets now.
Who says they have to get the same amount of revenue they get now?
Is the Strategic Helium Reserve a vital necessity, considering that the
armed forces haven't used lighter-than-air aircraft since the 1930's?
A constant, per-person tax will encourage EVERYONE to take a
serious look at how much money we waste.
> That would decimate the lower income people while giving the rich
> a free ride.
So, your entire argument is based on class warfare? Remember, MOST
of society's problems which necessitate government in the first place
are caused by "the poor"...the "poorly-behaved" is a better description.
> That realization is what chilled the idea of a flat tax.
If one failure is cause for abandoning an idea, then why do the
Leftists keep browbeating us with the same moronic socialism
and welfare agendas year after fucking year after fucking year????
Here's a clue, ed. Practically everyone under the age of 30 in
this country rejoiced the last time there was a "government shutdown"
and the only things operating were the essential services "military,
police, and courts".
>
> As for the lower income using more public resources, that's
> bullshit. The entire working poor class is making less money by
> working than they could by going on the gov dole, yet most continue to
> choose working, rather than ask the gov for help.
And if you lowered the tax-burden of their employers, these very
same people would
a) be able to get HIGHER wages, and
b) have a lower cost of living...allowing them to put money into
SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT, and thus achieve financial\
independance quite quickly.
Have you ever been self employed, and sit down and write out checks
to the government for your taxes? It's fucking ridiculous.
>
> You're a representative of the rich, Aaron, folks who don't give a
> damn about anyone else, that's very clear.
>
> -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 03:37:49 -0500
From: gLiTcH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A funny thing about Windoze networking (if you can really call it
> Of course not. Unreasonable people are incapable of applying reason.
>
> Do you think a 10GB hard disk only holds 10GB of raw bits? No, it's much
> more, but after formatting it leaves 10GB of available bit storage.
>
> The reason for the compound document is to store things like pictures,
> versioning information,
so that's where the backward compatibility breaks down huh?
> etc in a single document, so that if you move the
> document, you also move all it's embedded objects. If you don't call that
> reasonable, then you are incapable of looking at it reasonably.
>
> > > Why do you have 100 users creating empty word documents every day and
> > > storing them on your server? Perhaps you should educate them not to do
> > > that. While you're at it, you might want to educate them about not
> creating
> > > unique copies of their databases every day as well, or not deleting all
> > > their documents, since clearly such users are brain dead.
> >
> > You should take a look at what "average" users do.
>
> Average users don't create empty word documents *EVERY DAY* for a year.
not everyday for a year but believe me, it DOES happened. I have witnessed it
before, just a week ago actually.
>
> Where do they store all these emty documents anyways?
places that are hard to find, but they are on the hard drive, just in various
directories more than likely as the average user has no clue how to save things
to the same directory AND recall what directory it was that they used
>
>
> > > Ever heard of compression? Even in the unlikely situation that you
> > > describe, empty documents compress down to a very small size.
> >
> > Compression is like an income tax deduction. It is better to not spend
> > money than it is to deduct it. Do the math. Regardless of the
> > "randomness" of the document, it is still not going to evaluate to 0. If
> > the document contains text, it is mathematically impossible, using
> > similar algorithms, to compress a larger document containing essentially
> > the same information as a smaller document to be as small or smaller
> > than the smaller document.
>
> Uhh... and your point is?
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 03:55:31 -0500
From: gLiTcH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: If Microsoft starts renting apps
Nathaniel Jay Lee wrote:
> "Ferdinand V. Mendoza" wrote:
> >
> > If you can get good, free sex from a friend, why pay a whore?
> >
> > Ferdinand
> >
> > Tony Davis wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Does anyone here think that Linux will become more popular if Windows and
> > > every other Microsoft app goes to a rent basis?
> > >
> > > Tony
>
> I know I'll get booed, but what the hell:
>
> Cause the whore is a pro, and probably knows how to do things that your
> friend providing free sex doesn't. Of course, these are the things that
> cause heart-attacks and strokes (hmmm, I drew the analogy to Windows
> even better than I thought I could). And let's not forget the great
> array of diseases provided by the whore.
>
I guess morals isn't a question anymore huh? If so then neither the friend nor
the whore would be an option. But then again in this day and age everyone likes
to make their own morals so in their mind they are perfect.
good joke though about the windows analogy
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Nathaniel Jay Lee
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 03:58:09 -0500
From: gLiTcH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: If Microsoft starts renting apps
sylvain hutchison wrote:
> All I have to say is you will never have better sex than with the "one" you
> truely love!!! In other words, how can you love Microsoft??
there you go. good point. nuff said.
>
>
> sly.
------------------------------
From: "Stuart Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Micro$oft retests TPC benchmark
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:18:50 +0100
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > >
> > > In EXCEEDINGLY RARE the event of catastrophic failure on a Unix
machine,
> > > all you have to do is
> > >
> > > a) reload the absolute minimal base operating system (30 min max.)
> > > b) recover from last night's backup tapes.
> >
> > As with NT.
>
> Have fun with that registry crap
>
> HA HAWWWWWWWW
What do you mean? I just need to select the "Restore Registry" box - no
problem. Running NT reliably or restoring it easily is nowhere near as
problematic as you seem to think. The only times I've had to do complete
restores from tape is on systems that have lost system disks with no RAID...
>
>
> > <Snip massive and completely pointless sig>
>
<Second Snip massive and completely pointless sig>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was:
Microsoft Ruling Too Harsh
Date: 2 Aug 2000 05:33:06 -0400
Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed this unto the Network:
>I have no certifications from anybody (other than Stinger Missile
>Gunner and Single Channel Radio Operator from the US Army).
>My references are my credentials.
In a message you wrote to Knackos (from that stupid sig you won't
get rid of) you said you became a "Unix Systems Engineer" at Purdue
University. Sounds to me like you have a degree, or, in other words,
a credential.
--
Microsoft Windows: Now complete with a built-in BOFH!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was:
Microsoft Ruling Too Harsh
Date: 2 Aug 2000 05:36:46 -0400
Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed this unto the Network:
>Most government bureaucracies are little more than havens for
>busy-body closet-dictators.
Businesses are full of closet-dictators as well, except they're
called by the business term for "busy-body closet-dictator", which is
"manager".
--
Have you re-installed your operating system today?
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 05:57:22 -0400
Loren Petrich wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
> >> On Tue, 01 Aug 2000 20:23:15 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> >> >Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
> >> >> Consumption taxes hit the lower and middle classes harder because they
> >> >> spend a greater portion of their income.
> >> This softens their impact, but the above still applies.
> >So? Anything else breeds "class envy" appeals which the socialists
> >of both ilk use to manipulate the populace.
>
> Let's see. Mr. Kulkis has called the Kennedy and Rockefeller
> families "trust-fund babies". If anyone else called them that, I'm sure
> that Mr. Kulkis would howl "CLASS ENVY!!!!!"
>
> >Stipulating that one's tax bill should be based solely on "the
> >ability to pay," then you are endorsing the Communist principle
> >"FROM EACH according to his abilities" -- i.e. the more 'able'
> >you are, the greater amount of OTHER people's burden you are
> >expect to carry.
>
> >"Progressive" tax rates fall into this same category
> >"Flat tax" plans ALSO fall into this category.
>
> Grow up. There are good reasons for richer people to pay more in
> absolute amounts, even if not in relative amounts;
Name one that isn't based on any of the following:
a) class envy arguments
b) "they can afford it" arguments
[by that logic, we shouldn't prosecute shoplifters, either]
c) wealth redistribution arguments
> one need not support
> soak-the-rich taxation to support that principle.
Like you, for example....
> And I'm *not* a fan of
> soak-the-rich taxation.
When have you ever been against it?
> For instance, such people have more that has to
> be protected by the government, and I mean protected with both force and
> legal recognition.
Hint fucking hint: Most "rich" people already pay for their own
private security force. The police are, legally, only INVESTIGATORS.
They are not allowed to legally intercede in before a crime is committed
the same way that private security forces can.
Not only that....but...the majority of the reason for the police is
NOT because "rich people have stuff", it's because LOWLIFES STEAL SHIT.
Your argument is nothing more than "punish those who have things"
They're already paying for their own private security force AND you
are saying that they should also pay a higher tax rate for a police
force that doesn't do diddly-squat for them.
>
> And if I got fabulously filthy rich, I would not begrudge paying
> more in absolute amounts than most other people.
This is the same man who only yesterday was talking about how having
"tends[sic] of thousands of slaves cowering in fear" is the mark of
success.
You so altruistic, Loren.
You altruistic long time.
>
> >The only thing that is ethical is a "head tax" That is, your
> >family pays, say, $10,000 / head, or whatever.
>
> So says the Leona Helmsley Brigade, which include those who are
> more than happy to see the Kennedys and the Rockefellers pay very little
> in taxes compared to the rest of the population.
What part of "IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SALES TAX" do you not understand?
>
> And Margaret Thatcher tried levying such a tax in Britain, and
> look where that got her.
Yes, the British are equally addicted to socialism in the same
way as so many opium addicts.
>
> >This puts an IMMEDIATE end to the constant gaming of the system
> >of each group trying to get the rest of society to pay for
> >*their* favorite cause.
>
> Including military pork, a kind of pork that Mr. Kulkis finds
> very difficult to criticize.
Oh, I fully acknowledge that military procurement is fucked up. There's
never been a government in the world that hasn't had a pork-laden
military procurement system from beginning to end.
What *I* find curious is why you think that this same pork-laden
procurement system should be enlarged to engulf housing, the medical
community, education, and every other aspect of life?
By your very own words, military procurement is pork-laden. It has
NOTHING to do with the military, and EVERYTHING to do with the fact
that the purchaser is a governmental body, and thus, subject to the
whims of politicians who are more interested in their own personal
aggrandizement than they are in actual benefit to the people.
Of course, for closet-dictators like you, that whole scenario is
your ultimate wet-dream.
>
> >> What, are you saying that a millionaire should pay the same dollar amount as
> >> a grad student on $7500 or so ? I'd hardly call that "fair".
> >Define "fair"
>
> What do you think "fair" means?
YOU are the one using the word "FAIR", therefore, it is incumbent
upon YOUR to define your fucking terms, asshole.
>
> >Keep in mind that the millionaire uses *LESS* government resources
> >than the grad student.
>
> ROTFL. A millionaire has much more in assets to protect than a
> grad student, so uses much more in government resources, even if only
> indirectly.
Your "soak the rich" bias is clearly evident.
Who is responsible for the costs of a criminal investigation and
subsequent prosecution:
a) the rightful owner who was robbed or burglarized
or
b) the lowlife scum who broke the law and stole it
>
> >Cutting back public services means: cutting back on the kinds of
> >things that people should ALREADY be paying for themselves.
>
> Does that include military and police protection, by any chance?
> And running the court system?
Nope. Those are constitutionally mandated functions.
Read it and weep, fat-boy:
http://www.nara.gov/exhall/charters/constitution/constitution.html
Pertinent line-items have been marked with an asterisk (*):
Article 1, Section 8
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts
and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and
general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and
Excises
shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several
States, and with the Indian Tribes;
* To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on
the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and
fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
* To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and
current Coin of the United States;
* To establish Post Offices and post Roads;
* To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for
limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their
respective Writings and Discoveries;
* To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
* To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas,
and Offences against the Law of Nations;
* To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules
concerning Captures on Land and Water;
* To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to
that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
* To provide and maintain a Navy;
* To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of
the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; [i.e. police]
* To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and
for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of
the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the
Appointment
of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according
to
the discipline prescribed by Congress;
* To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such
District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of
particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of
the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority
over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the
State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts,
Magazines,
Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--And
* To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into
Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this
Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any
Department or Officer thereof.
>
> And does this mean that insurance companies and health-care-plan
> companies have no right to exist?
How obtuse are you? Those are PRIVATE companies. We are talking about
the function of GOVERNMENT AND TAXES. People can willingly purchase
insurance if they so desire, or they can willingly forego insurance.
It's no business of government either way.
>
> >> Both alternatives would move things back to the 19th century kind of scenario
> >> -- how much you earn would be predetermined by how much your parents earned,
> >Providing great incentive for adults to work as opposed to mooching
> >off of the gover^H^H^H^H^H TAXPAYERS.
>
> If such mooching is so great, why not do it yourself, Mr. Kulkis?
Unlike you and your ilk, I have ethics.
> It would give you LOTS of time to study so that you can become a *much*
> better Unix sysadmin and do *much* more research into Communist conspiracies.
1. Are you alleging that conspiracies don't exist? If that is true,
then why, if you go into a federal court, does one find, "the conspiracy
to ....." among the charges filed by the prosecutor?
2. Since the existance of conspiracies is now well ascertained,
are you alleging that an organization (the whole of communism) which
vows to overthrow governments around the world, does not engage in
conspiracies?
Are you really that naive, or are you just spewing propaganda
as usual, traitor.
> >> because the poor kids would not receive health care or a decent education ( if
> >> any education at all ) OTOH, the rich kids would be on a gravy train.
> >Does the concept of private charity and scholarships elude you?
>
> However, a society built according to Mr. Kulkis's ideals would
> not have *ANY* of those, because he opposes *anything* that might be
> considered a handout.
Nope. I am in FULL support of VOLOUNTARILY SUPPORTED charities.
The problem with government handouts is that the people who are
paying the money don't have any say in what happens. You maintain
that "corporate welfare" is immoral, but "lazy slob" welfare is ok.
I make no such meaningless distinctions. ALL involountarily funded
welfare is immoral.
> I don't see him bragging about how much of his
> income he gives away;
I already give away several tens of thousands of dollars per year.
I see no reason to give away more in a time when the economy is soo
good that even wheelchair-bound teenagers can get manual labor jobs.
> I've yet to see much evidence of an Aaron Kulkis
> Scholarship Fund.
Evidently, You're not looking hard enough!
I contribute to a scholarship fund for military veterans. In fact,
I'm one of it's founders.
> There isn't a Loren Petrich one either, I will concede,
> but that's because I don't have enough money to create one.
YOU GODDAMN HYPOCRITICAL GREEDY FUCKING ASSHOLE!
>
> >> What you'd end up with is an anti-meritocracy, where old money takes
> >> precedence over new genius.
> >Not if income taxes are abolished and replaced with consumption taxes.
>
> I don't see the connection.
Why is this not the slightest be surprising.....moron.
> --
> Loren Petrich Happiness is a fast Macintosh
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] And a fast train
> My home page: http://www.petrich.com/home.html
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: Dale Lakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split Save It?
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 10:00:50 GMT
> ¯You mean providing an enviroment that allows a poweruser to rapidly and
> ¯effectively multitask between a multitude of different documents and
> ¯applications at the same time?
>
That bit about winderz "multitasking" is something that irks me every time
I hear it. I'm required to use an NT box at work and every time the box is
the slightest bit busy it takes like 15 seconds to flip between "multitudes
of different documents." My linux boxes at home don't exhibit this behavior
in the least - even if I'm compiling a kernel on one virtual desktop and
running a java program in another I flip between documents, VT's and even
desktops when no noticeable delay. This is particularly troublesome
considering that the NT box at work is a pentium 400 and my fastest box at
home is an AMD 300.
Winderz may multitask in the strict sense of the word, but barely... and
certainly not very well.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Zealot | "The only intuitive user interface is
Linux Advocate | the nipple. Everything else is learned."
AIX Whore | --Bruce Ediger
--------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
From: V'rgo Vardja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How Can I contribute?
Date: 2 Aug 2000 10:03:50 GMT
Tim Palmer wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>I am working for a company which already have open sourced device
>>drivers and applications for linux. We have certain kerna patches
>>and device driver enhancements that we like to contribute to Linux
>>community in general. Who should we contact? Thanks for any
>>pointers!
>
> Contact you're butholl.
<sarcasm>
And the Wintrolls say Linvocates are rude...
</sarcasm>
--
ERROR: CPU not detected. Emulating.
-Win2k
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.society.liberalism
Subject: Re: Aaron Kulkis -- USELESS Idiot -- And His "Enemies" -was- Another one of
Lenin's Useful Idiots denies reality
Date: 2 Aug 2000 06:07:20 -0400
Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed this unto the Network:
>SemiScholar wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 26 Jul 2000 12:58:09 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >Democracy is 6 wolves and 2 lambs voting on what to have for dinner.
>> >
>>
>> Wrong. Democracy is 10 lambs and 1 wolf voting on what to have for
>> dinner.
>
>Oh really. Look at any democratic system,
You can't. There aren't any.
>> In most other systems, it's the wolf alone who decides.
>> Democracy is the only system in which lambs stand a chance.
>Visit any high school,
High schools aren't democratic.
--
Microsoft Windows. Beyond crappy. Beyond belief.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
