Linux-Advocacy Digest #710, Volume #30 Thu, 7 Dec 00 08:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Red hat becoming illegal? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Bracy")
Re: Linux is awful ("Adam Short")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Bracy")
Re: Red hat becoming illegal? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Linux is awful ("scatterman")
Re: Linux is awful ("scatterman")
Re: lotus notes (Nick Ruisi)
Re: Linux Sux (Terry Porter)
The return of S (Nick Ruisi)
Re: Red hat becoming illegal? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Red hat becoming illegal? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Red hat becoming illegal?
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 05:50:24 -0500
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> >
> > Because he was hell-bent on abriding first-amendment rights,
> > limiting the ability of candidates and citizens to publicize
> > their views on election issues, turning over all communication
> > to the leftist Ministries of Propaganda more commonly known as
> > ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC.
>
> I always get a chuckle over references to "the liberal media."
> Although it is true nowadays that these stations now broadcast
> thinly-disquised entertainment under the guise of "news".
Actually, it's propaganda. When was the last time you saw a
story about the succesful, law-abiding defensive use of a firearm
against a criminal?
Happens every day...and yet, it's never "news".
Why is that?
>
> > McCain was defeated because his ideas would assure that
> > ALL opposition to the Democrat party would be effectively
> > silenced forever.
>
> Drinking Sterno again?
Over 90% of journalists are nothing more than Democrat party
cheerleaders. If no politician were allowed to advertise, we
would very quickly devolve into a one-party system.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Bracy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks.
Crossposted-To: alt.linux.sux
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:38:49 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Swango wrote:
>>
>> Windows 2000 rocks
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Patented Claire line.
>
> PLONK
Indeed, you are correct. Here are the message headers from "Swango" as
well as Claire:
Swango:
Path:
typhoon.austin.rr.com!cyclone2.austin.rr.com!cyclone.austin.rr.com!newsfeed2.skycache.com!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.19!wnmasters2!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Swango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.linux.sux
Subject: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 21:20:20 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.79.2.13
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 976137620 12.79.2.13 (Wed, 06 Dec 2000
21:20:20 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 21:20:20 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Xref: cyclone2.austin.rr.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:380798 alt.linux.sux:8086
Claire:
Path:
typhoon.austin.rr.com!cyclone2.austin.rr.com!cyclone.austin.rr.com!newsfeed2.skycache.com!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!europa.netcrusader.net!204.127.161.3!wn3feed!worldnet.att.net!wnmasters2!bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Mandrake 7.2 Quick Review
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 52
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 02:52:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.79.4.113
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 974947947 12.79.4.113 (Thu, 23 Nov 2000
02:52:27 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 02:52:27 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Xref: cyclone2.austin.rr.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:376784
If Windows is so great, why do WinTrolls feel the need to lie and
deceive?
Bracy
------------------------------
From: "Adam Short" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux is awful
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:59:23 GMT
>From what I've read here, some people seem to be running completely
different versions of Windows to anything I've ever come across. MY Win98SE
does exactly what Jerry says w/r to the registry. MY Win98SE install prog
formats the Windows partition if it finds a FAT32 partition with no
filesystem actually written to it, regardless of what I want it to do.
The differences between what happens on my machine and what seems to happen
on certain other machines is rather striking. Assuming that these things are
actually happening on other machines (and I'm not saying they're not),
wouldn't that point to there being several different implementations of the
same basic OS version? Perhaps there is a version out there that isn't as
full of crap as mine. I hope not, it would make Windows that much harder to
kill off.
My Mandrake 7.2 system is truly beautiful now, I almost feel guilty for
making it sit on the same hard drive as Windows.
Adam
Jerry Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:5hAX5.44$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In comp.os.linux.x Kelsey Bjarnason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [snips]
>
> > "Jerry Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:ZRdX5.4296$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> >> > No, if you double click a reg file, it tell you "Are you sure you
want
> > to
> >> > add the information in <file name> to the registry?"
> >>
> >> No, it doesn't, it just blithely merges it into the registry.
>
>
> > If it doesn't, then it's because _you_ (or whoever did your Windows
install)
> > *specifically* went out of their way to *make* it not ask. It can be
done -
> > but it's not done that way by default.
>
>
> NO I DIDN'T. I don't know or care enough to know that much about
> windows to make such a change.
>
> Jerry
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Bracy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks.
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:43:33 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Swango"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought server option meant it was going to install server programs
> like Apache and Samba and so forth. Unfortunately the minute you select
> it your hard drive is gone. No warning at all.
Only a moron installs a new operating system without reading the freaking
manual first. Someone like.... Claire!
Bracy
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Red hat becoming illegal?
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 06:02:31 -0500
Bob Hauck wrote:
>
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2000 01:56:43 GMT, Chad Myers
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >When have you ever heard a Democrat say "That government program is
> >TOO large, we need to reduce it"
>
> Some Democrats want to kill SDI. But I guess that isn't what you
> meant.
>
> Ask your buddy Rush if the number of Federal employees has increased or
> decreased under Clinton.
Military personnel: reduced...while at the same time, ordering
the HIGHEST operations tempo since Viet Nam.
Civilian personnel (gestapo-police, petty bureaucrats, and other
oxygen thieves): increased by almost the same number as were
gutted out of the military
> Ask him about the growth rate of the federal
> budget and the deficit under Clinton vs Reagan.
>
> >Look at Taxachusetts. Overrun with Democrats, taxes sky high,
> >government programs to help every do everything without thinking on
> >or own or having self reliance.
>
> Yeah, what a hell-hole it is there. Programmers making six figures, 2%
What about non-programmers? What's the standard of living in
Taxachussetts for someone making $30k. In Michigan, it is QUITE
a livable salary.
The reason programmers make 6-figures around Boston is because
the whole damn state is so damned expensive.
> unemployment, headhunters bugging you all day long, stores at the mall
> paying signing bonuses. They're even cleaning up Boston Harbor, what a
> bunch of assholes those Democrats are.
Considering that it was mostly government-related work that
polluted the harbor in the first place...what's your point?
>
> And...they just lowered the income tax rate.
>
> >Another example? Hillary Clinton trying to pass a government program
> >that would take up 1/3 of the entire budget of the United States.
>
> Yeah, what would the insurance companies and HMO's do then? They get
> that money now.
As bad as insurance companies and HMO's are, they are at least
semi-responsive, because you can take their asses to court.
You also have the option of switching companies.
Now, if some government bureacrat with the brains of a gas-station clerk
makes the wrong medical decision about YOUR life...what are you going
to do? Most judges will NOT let you sue the government.
>
> >Liberals are anti-freedom and anti-capitalism.
>
> I guess that explains the boom in Taxachusetts and the last eight years
> of economic expansion. You're so smart Chad!
It's not "because of" the taxes..it's "despite them", you fool
>
> --
> -| Bob Hauck
> -| To Whom You Are Speaking
> -| http://www.haucks.org/
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "scatterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: Linux is awful
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 11:09:07 GMT
I love windows crashes! I really like when the Kernel starts crashing over
and over, and wont even allow you to shutdown.
"Ian Davey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Bull shit.
> >
> >I'm here to learn linux, but I've spent far more time running MS
> >software. I rarely reboot except when I install software, which means
> >my system tends to run weeks and sometimes months at a time,
> >running win98.
> >
> >My experience is that it isn't a problem. You linux assholes who
> >post pure lies like "Windows won't run more than a few days
> >at a time" are full of shit. You are sitting there with your head
> >stuck under the ground, trying to tell people what the world is
> >like. Those of us who aren't hiding can look and see that the
> >world is nothing like you claim.
>
> Actually most of these posts are coming from experience, the vast majority
of
> Linux people have Windows experience. After all, it's quite hard to
> avoid. Whereas most Windows users don't have Linux experience. Just
because
> you've been fortunate doesn't mean everyone is. I don't use Windows
anymore,
> have got off the treadmill because of those kind of problems. It's too
much
> like russian roulette.
>
> Linux has been completely crash free and incredibly stable. The odd
> application has been known to crash (though without causing any of the
> problems you get when a windows ap crashes, often requiring a reboot). You
> don't need to reboot to install applications, or even hardware.
>
> ian.
>
> \ /
> (@_@) http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/ (dark literature)
> /(&)\ http://www.eclipse.co.uk/sweetdespise/libertycaptions/ (art)
> | |
------------------------------
From: "scatterman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: Linux is awful
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 11:11:04 GMT
All I can relate is my personal experiences, But if you can keep windows up
for that long then your a wizard.
"WorLord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Taken from the obscure and questionable writings of "scatterman"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> >Even the best W9X version (the original with all the updates) could
hardly
> >run longer then a few days.
>
> Someone else will probably (or has probably) said this already, but
> that's pure unadulterated bullshit.
>
> The machine I'm typing on (WinME) has been up since the 3rd of
> November.
>
> Now, I'll grant you that it takes a lot of work and tweaking to get
> Wind9x *that* stable; but it can be done.
>
> --WorLord
>
> "You could spend an hour counting the petals in a flower
> It might take you a year to count the veins in each petal
> If you spent ten lifetimes, maybe you could count its cells...
>
> ...but you'd have completely missed the point
> You fuckhead."
------------------------------
From: Nick Ruisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: lotus notes
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 06:44:49 -0500
Im using VMWare to run notes
"W.Edwin van der Meijden, Alforto" wrote:
>
> ls,
>
> does anyone know of Lotus Notes running on Linux?
>
> W. Edwin van der Meijden
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terry Porter)
Subject: Re: Linux Sux
Reply-To: No-Spam
Date: 07 Dec 2000 11:56:06 GMT
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000 01:05:58 -0500, Walton Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Great, a troll posting some bullshit and a bunch of morons replying to it.
*******At least we didnt REpost the whole dam thing******!
>All right now, here it comes. Swango gets !PL0NK!ed for posting such an
>unoriginal troll, and everybody who reples to this gets a resounding !SPNAK!
>laid upon them for not using their gray matter.
Look whos talking you big silly goose, YOU posted over 300 lines of trash
the whole damn message!
>*SPNAK!*
>*plonk*x10^999...
<yer plonked yourself! >
>
>Swango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
--
Kind Regards
Terry
--
**** ****
My Desktop is powered by GNU/Linux, and has been
up 3 days 22 hours 45 minutes
** Registration Number: 103931, http://counter.li.org **
------------------------------
From: Nick Ruisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: The return of S
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 06:57:09 -0500
Hi S!
It looks like you cant even get a simple
10 PRINT "stupid text"
20 GOTO 10
to Work!
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Red hat becoming illegal?
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 07:14:48 -0500
Tom Wilson wrote:
>
> "Chris Ahlstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Chad Myers wrote:
> > >
> > > Note that these "more accurate counts" are only happening in largely
> > > Democratic counties, and even specific precincts in those counties. If
> > > we had a full state-wide recount (which we shouldn't have had any hand
> > > recounts in the first place, since the law has yet to allow for them in
> > > Florida) we would find that Bush is still the winner.
> >
> > If one assumes that erroneous counts are truly random, then a recount
> > in any given precinct would only rarely change the results. Of course,
> > this assumes that the precincts are large enough that extremes in either
> > direction are unlikely.
> >
> > So, when you say that a full recount would yield Bush still being the
> > winner, you are almost certainly right. However, the same statement
> > can be made about a Dade-only recount, though the certainty of being
> > right would be a little less, since smaller numbers are involved.
> >
> > > In Duval county, a Republican stronghold, almost 30,000 ballots were
> > > thrown out due to the same things the Democrats are complaining about
> > > in Dade and Broward. Why aren't the Dems concerned with those votes
> getting
> > > counted?
> >
> > Because it is the Republican's job to follow up on their interests.
> > Furthermore, if the place is a Republican stronghold, perhaps the tally
> > for the Republicans was so high that the results of 30,000 votes would
> > not change the total result in Duval county.
> >
> > > Please don't fall for the Democrat mantra that all votes must count,
> they're
> > > just interested in counting enough selective ballots to give them the
> victory
> > > and sweep all the other Bush ballots under the rug.
> >
> > No, they're just hoping that Lady Luck will somehow uncover enough more
> Gore
> > votes. The odds are against it.
>
> Lady Luck and Lady poke the dimple when no-one is looking.
>
> >
> > > Let us not also forget about the 60,000 ballots in Oregon, 40,000+ in
> New
> > > Mexico, 100,000+ in Iowa and 85,000+ in Wisconsin. Not to mention the
> > > several hundred cited, documented, proven incidents of Democratic fraud
> > > in Milwaukee alone that cost Bush thousands of votes and would've
> enabled
> > > him to win the state.
> >
> > You've been listening to Rush, ain't ya?
>
> I get most of it the same place HE does...The AP NewsWire. Anything of his I
> can't verify through a reliable source gets ignored.
>
> >
> > > Shall we talk about the 5,000 felons in Florida who voted for Gore?
> >
> > Jumpin' off the deep end, here!
> >
> > > Or the 30,000+ illegal alien Mexicans who voted in California?
> >
> > Whom did they vote for? Says who?
>
> You know damned well who they voted for - The party that very recently
> campained to get their illegal status overturned. They weren't interested in
> creating new citizens either...They were manufacturing constituents. The
> Democrats in Oklahoma did similar ass-kissing in even small county elections
> in 1992. (I was there and an active campaigner for a Democratic sheriff and
> also helped with a Ft. Smith, Arkansas benefit for then Gov.Clinton's
> presidential race. I completely abandoned the party in 1993 after the
> experience.
>
> >
> > > Or
> > > the 60,000+ deceased democrats who voted nation-wide (probably more)?
> >
> > Another unsubstantiated guess, with a gratuitous "probably" thrown in.
>
> I'm willing to bet the same number of mortally-challenged Republicans voted
> in the same manner. I may be a moderate Republican these days, but i'm also
> realistic...
>
> >
> > > What about the 50,000+ aliens who were expedited through the
> > > nationalization process (which usually takes 10+ years) in 5 months
> > > to vote for Democrats in Washington and New York?
> >
> > So now government efficiency is wrong <grin>?
>
> Read comments regarding California voting Mexicans posted above and use your
> head!
>
> >
> > > Whenever I hear a Democrat spout sanctimony, it makes me sick because
> > > they are so corrupt, so foul, and break every conceivable law and ones
> > > that haven't even been written yet to foul the whole election process.
> >
> > When someone speaks about a group having some horrible features, lumping
> > all instances of individuals in that group with the word "they", you
> > know that the speaker has turned off his or her mind. In fact, the
> > strength of your vituperation shows that you're either angry or crazy.
> > Look at some famous enemies in history:
> >
> > Republicans/Democrats
> > Hindus/Moslems
> > Catholics/Protestants
> >
> > The angry words and calumny fly thick and fast, yet the differences
> > between the two groups are essentially without significance.
>
> The Hindu and Moslem faiths are VASTLY different and contradict one another.
> You can measure the bad blood there in millenia. It won't change either.
>
> You forgot Jews/Moslems. Same thing there plus a property dispute to boot.
> It'll be solved when one of them ceases to exist. Peace keeping efforts do
> little more than keep the oil flowing.
>
> Catholocism and Protestant reform factions differ on many levels. Mostly
> trivial ones. The lines of distinction are bluring, though. (Cmon' John
> Paul...Let'em wrap their John Thomases...This isn't the middle ages
> anymore!) I'm Baptist (Of Sorts) and therefore ignore most of it. So do my
> Catholic friends.
>
> Republicans and Democrats CAN heal. Republicans have either tossed or lost a
> number of their wackos already (Jesse Helms (Bigotted White Trash), Newt
> Gingrich (Asshole), Moral Majority (Contradiction Extremis), Pat Buchannon
> (We rented out your room, so don't even think about coming back), and other
> ultra right wingers) Its' the Democrats' turn, now, to get rid of THEIR
> wackos. (The list is LARGE). It could be done. Centrist ideologies on both
Get rid of Demoncrook WACKOS and the party will be devoid of leadership.
It's pretty fucking sad for the Left wing when the "sanest"
leader in their camp is that basket-case Ralph Nader.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Red hat becoming illegal?
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 07:15:23 -0500
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
> Tom Wilson wrote:
> >
> > > You've been listening to Rush, ain't ya?
> >
> > I get most of it the same place HE does...The AP NewsWire. Anything of his I
> > can't verify through a reliable source gets ignored.
>
> I *knew* you were listening to Rush.
Is that a crime now?
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
