Linux-Advocacy Digest #844, Volume #30 Wed, 13 Dec 00 08:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Ayende Rahien")
Re: Whistler review. ("Ayende Rahien")
Re: Whistler review. ("Ayende Rahien")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Predictions (featuring Drestin Black) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Predictions (featuring Drestin Black) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Predictions (featuring Drestin Black) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Caught me a Lino-Troll Mr. T-Max ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks. ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux.sux
Subject: Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks.
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:36:57 -0500
Ayende Rahien wrote:
>
> "SwifT -" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Nick Ruisi wrote:
> >
> > > Anyway, who the hell wants the old "your network settings have
> > > changed, press any key to reboot" message on a production server?
> >
> > Although Linux is still far ahead of Microsoft on that point (networking),
> > this example has exceeded his end-date. Microsoft Windows 2000 can change
> > it's settings without rebooting. It took a long time, but they finally
> > did. Now we have to find another good example. Maybe something like
> > 'updating the GUI without rebooting'
>
> Possible, see WindowBlinds & LiteSteps as 3rd party proof, and Whistler
> skinning as well.
Concerning oneself with goddamned skins is for fucking looooooooooooooosers.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux.sux
Subject: Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks.
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:32:21 +0200
"John Travis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> And Ayende Rahien spoke unto the masses...
>
> >Possible, see WindowBlinds & LiteSteps as 3rd party proof, and Whistler
> >skinning as well.
>
> Yes, skinning bloatware, that will be efficient. I'd prefer not to need
another
> 128 megs to run my programs comfortably.
Nope, it takes 2MB at most.
> >Possible on 99% of the programs that you would install.
>
> I hate to burst your bubble but this number isn't very accurate. I just
did a
> clean install of W2k on another machine. I'd say at 30-40% of the
programs
> loaded on called for a reboot. Even updating something like PowerDesk
calls for
> a reboot. Naturally it isn't that annoying when you can just feed in cds
and do
> it all at once, but still...
They *request* reboot, that it a flaw in the installer, they don't *need*
reboot.
------------------------------
From: "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Whistler review.
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:36:40 +0200
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 08:09:47 +0200, Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> >"Charlie Ebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:00:50 -0500,
> >> Gary Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Ayende Rahien wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Do check again, anyone with root privileges and not enough knowledge
> >can
> >> >> crush a *nix, or any other OS, for that matter.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Going willy-nilly in root is a far cry from Win2K hosing itself when
you
> >> >install a wrong application.
> >> >
> >> >"747's are reliable, so long as you don't take off the wings" and
> >> >"windows is reliable so long as you don't install 'bad' applications
and
> >> >'know' what you are doing" are NOT equivant statements. (and if
> >> >something does go wrong it is obviously YOUR FAULT) Read my ORIGIONAL
> >> >post in this light and it point should be more clear.
> >> >
> >>
> >> <snipage>
> >>
> >> This is typical of the Windows mentality.
> >>
> >> The definition of an operating system includes the ability
> >> to adequately recover from application failure. In short,
> >> this means you shouldn't be able to write a program bad
> >> enough to make an operating system go down. Thus, Windows
> >> is not an operating system.
> >
> >Show me the OS that can't be taken down by an applicaiton having root
> >privileges.
>
> That isn't relevant for this discussion unless you can't
> do anything useful with the OS without running as root.
>
> >This is what we are talking about.
>
> Doubtful.
Then what *are* we talking about?
> >> It has no recovery, no protection, it's purely a large
> >> application in itself.
> >
> >I still have to run into an application that will crush Win2K.
>
> A low intensity 2D game using a mature version of DX will do.
Can you name one available for download?
------------------------------
From: "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Whistler review.
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:38:14 +0200
"Charlie Ebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000 08:09:47 +0200,
> Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >"Charlie Ebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:00:50 -0500,
> >> Gary Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Ayende Rahien wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Do check again, anyone with root privileges and not enough knowledge
> >can
> >> >> crush a *nix, or any other OS, for that matter.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Going willy-nilly in root is a far cry from Win2K hosing itself when
you
> >> >install a wrong application.
> >> >
> >> >"747's are reliable, so long as you don't take off the wings" and
> >> >"windows is reliable so long as you don't install 'bad' applications
and
> >> >'know' what you are doing" are NOT equivant statements. (and if
> >> >something does go wrong it is obviously YOUR FAULT) Read my ORIGIONAL
> >> >post in this light and it point should be more clear.
> >> >
> >>
> >> <snipage>
> >>
> >> This is typical of the Windows mentality.
> >>
> >> The definition of an operating system includes the ability
> >> to adequately recover from application failure. In short,
> >> this means you shouldn't be able to write a program bad
> >> enough to make an operating system go down. Thus, Windows
> >> is not an operating system.
> >
> >Show me the OS that can't be taken down by an applicaiton having root
> >privileges.
> >This is what we are talking about.
> >
> >> It has no recovery, no protection, it's purely a large
> >> application in itself.
> >
> >I still have to run into an application that will crush Win2K.
> >Application do crush, and sometimes (rarely, btw) it's bad enough that
I've
> >to log off & on to recover from the crush, but that is about it.
> >
> >
> >
>
> At least *nix has a root. What is Windows excuse.
> Anybody, any common user can take down their system.
We are talking about Win2K systems here, if you want to talk about the Win9x
problems, I'll be more than happy to join the conversation.
> This is the point. And it's a point which is totally
> un-arguable.
Win2K/NT/Whistler protect the system from users unless they are running as
administrators.
> True, You CAN cripple a *nix to emulate the same thing.
> You can also pretend your dick is a pogo stick and go
> bouncing down the sidewalk for all I care.
>
> But Windows has no protection from this.
Actually, WinME tries to protect the user without going to true multi user
enviroment, it does this by basically reducing the user to non-root level,
with no way to access root level privileges short of hacking its own system.
It's one of the main complaints that I've against WinME.
The NT line offer this protection, and this is the one that we are talking
about here.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux.sux
Subject: Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks.
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:38:39 -0500
Tim Smith wrote:
>
> Swango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Windows 2000 rocks and Linux is a sluggard if ever there was one. I
> >tried Redhat and took the server install option and it promptly wiped
> >out my entire hard disk. Fortunately I had a backup but what if I
> >didn't?
>
> Let me see if I understand this. You selected an option that is clearly
> documented as being for people who want to wipe their entire systems and
> turn them into Linux servers, and you are surprised that it wiped your
> entire system and turned it into a Linux server?
EVERYTHING gets past swango...
>
> --Tim Smith
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux.sux
Subject: Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks.
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:39:31 -0500
Santa Warlord wrote:
>
> "Les Mikesell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:InZX5.40794$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > "Swangoremovemee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > On Fri, 08 Dec 2000 02:35:01 GMT, "Les Mikesell"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >You said it didn't support USB. If you loaded a version that does,
> > > >then why did you lie about it?
> > >
> > > You really DO HAVE TO LEARN HOW TO READ Les.
> > >
> > > This is the second time.
> > >
> > > I never said it didn't SUPPORT USB, I said NONE OF MY DEVICES WORKED.
> > >
> > > Please, learn how to read before you post erroneously.
> > >
> > > Swango
> >
> > Why are you blaming Linux for devices that don't work?
> >
>
> because that is the (one of) job of an OS. to get devices to work. duuuh!
>
Wrong. Getting devices to work is the responsibility of the
device manufacturer....to provide working device drivers.
> >
> > > >I take it you own a lot of MS stock and are worried?
> > >
> > > I don't own any stock.
> > >
> > > Swango
> >
> > Then why do you think anyone cares if your choice of
> > devices keeps you hopelessly locked into a monopolistic
> > vendor's operating systems?
> >
> > Les Mikesell
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux.sux
Subject: Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks.
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:42:08 -0500
Santa Warlord wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Swangoremovemee wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 08 Dec 2000 02:35:01 GMT, "Les Mikesell"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >You said it didn't support USB. If you loaded a version that does,
> > > >then why did you lie about it?
> > >
> > > You really DO HAVE TO LEARN HOW TO READ Les.
> > >
> > > This is the second time.
> > >
> > > I never said it didn't SUPPORT USB, I said NONE OF MY DEVICES WORKED.
> >
> > Why the fuck did you purchase devices that weren't supported by Linux?
> >
>
> because there is no warning sticker that says "warning! this device may not
> be supported under inferior operating systems, such as Linux"
If Linux is "inferior", then how come I can get 50 people all working,
off of the same 800 MHz K6-machine, with ALL the performance that is implied
by that, with mere boat-anchor 80386 machines on their desktops?
With Windows, to get 800 MHz performance on 50 desktops, one needs
to go out and purchase 50 800 MHz systems.
With Linux, I only need to buy one.
>
> > You know....even if you never intend to run Linux, it's in your
> > long-term best interest (as a consumer) to purchase only those
> > devices which ARE supported under multiple OS's.
> >
>
> I see. and how can you tell if a piece of hardware isn't supported by
> Linsux? Do penguins telepathically send you a message saying that a device
> is supported or not before you buy it?
>
> --
> "One by one the Penguins steal my sanity." (found printed on a T-shirt)
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Predictions (featuring Drestin Black)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:43:36 -0500
Conrad Rutherford wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Bob Hauck wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 17:40:41 -0500, JS/PL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > You'll find that the Linux (*internet surfing) desktop share is about
> > > > .003120. MS.* is about .9375222 as of October out of 554,519,878
> > > > samples. read/weep http://www.thecounter.com/stats/
> > >
> > > Why you think this is a good thing is what escapes a lot of us. I can't
> > > imagine it being a good thing to have one company control 93% of
> anything.
> > >
> >
> > I think we should eliminate Ford and Chrysler so that everybody
> > has to buy an Oldsmobile
>
> No one said anything about eliminating anyone. It's a simple reporting of
> fact that MS browsers are in use on 93% of all systems versus only about 0%
> for Linux.
Liar
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Predictions (featuring Drestin Black)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:44:24 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > kiwiunixman wrote:
> > >
> > > I wasn't aiming at Canada (I have visited Canada, and it ROCKS!),
> mainly
> > > the neighbour towards the south of Canada.
> >
> > Canada's neat...as long as you're not a resident in the country.
>
> Yeah. Sigs are neat too...as long as you're not some dumb loser
> with "size" issues who needs to make his 20+ lines long.
Sounds like you're projecting.
Why is that.
>
> > --
> > Aaron R. Kulkis
> > Unix Systems Engineer
> > DNRC Minister of all I survey
> > ICQ # 3056642
> >
>
> Don't knock my country. We're the only thing that gives North America
> value.
>
> -ws
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Predictions (featuring Drestin Black)
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:46:55 -0500
kiwiunixman wrote:
>
> <snype>
>
> > Well, the roots of the American Revolution was that the Colonies
> > fought (and died) protecting English interests in the French and Indian
> > war (1754-1763). Parliament then decided that THE COLONIES should
> > bear the economic burden of fighting this war (as if having their
> > homes attacked by the French/Indian alliance wasn't enough!), and
> > started implementing taxes exclusively on the very portion of their
> > citizens who had suffered through 10 years of war already.
> Same for New Zealand and Australian Soldiers sent to the Bore War in
> South Africa, 1st WW, 2 WW, and numorous wars prior to the Bore War.
> Colonists who did move to the Americas were still seen as subjects of
> the crown, hence, they still had to full their obligationas subjects of
> the crown.
True...but the French and Indian war was fought for the benefit
of England and the crown, not the Colonies nor the colonists.
Therefore, why should the the Colonies have paid for a war
which wasn't even for their benefit?
>
> >
> > The colonies' position was "we had no representation in Parliament,
> > let alone a vote on this issue, therefore, the taxes being levied
> > by the crown are illegitimate."
> >
> > Even British history books now recognise that the colonists' complaints
> > were not only meritorious, but that their request (representation in
> > Parliament) was reasonable.
> Whether America later would be represented in Parliament would have been
> highly likely as the size of the colony(s) increased, so the need to
> de-centralise (look into the gradual move from direct control of
> Australia and NEw Zealand via the Westminster Act 1911) would become a
> necessity, hence, later on would have gained dominion status (around
> 1800's).
True. But they weren't willing to wait who knows how many decades
for George to pull his head out of his ass.
>
> kiwiunixman
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Caught me a Lino-Troll Mr. T-Max
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:48:39 -0500
Slava Pestov wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Swangoremovemee wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>
> >> "It Don't Mean a Thang if it Ain't Got That Swang"
> >
> > A perfect summation of your lack of intellectual development.
> >
> > Here's a hint, swang-child....go back to your rap-ghetto. This
> > neighborhood is waaaaaaaaaay over your head.
>
> I'm afraid the above statement qualifies you as a redneck, Aaron.
Really? I grew up in Detroit.
>
> Slava
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Nobody wants Linux because it destroys hard disks.
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:49:53 -0500
kiwiunixman wrote:
>
> A concise way of explaining why UNIX is the way it is, "If it an't
> broken, don't bloody fix it", compared to Microsoft's, "If it is stable,
> then it needs to be fixed" metality.
>
> kiwiunixman
>
> <snype>
Well stated.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************