Linux-Advocacy Digest #862, Volume #31 Wed, 31 Jan 01 04:13:05 EST
Contents:
Re: THOLEN IS A MISERABLE PIECE OF SHIT ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Richard Stallman Streaming Video - Part II (James Thornton)
Re: Linux headache (Tim Cain)
Re: Lookout! The winvocates have a new FUD strategy! ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Linux 2.4 Major Advance ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: M$ websites down again - Problem solved -> use Linux! (Milton)
Re: NTFS Limitations (Was: RE: Red hat becoming illegal?) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Gates Vaccine ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: NTFS Limitations (Was: RE: Red hat becoming illegal?) (Charlie Ebert)
Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.unix.advocacy,soc.singles
Subject: Re: THOLEN IS A MISERABLE PIECE OF SHIT
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:55:48 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Edward Rosten writes:
>
> >>>>>>> It was origionally a tholen.vs.malloy thread.
>
> >>>>>> Incorrect, given that I haven't responded to Malloy.
>
> >>>>> Granted. It was a malloy vs tholen thread---he had responded to you.
>
> >>>> Rather one-sided to be using "vs".
>
> >>> Mabey, but he is still arguing with you (even though you don't
> >>> respond).
>
> >> Illogical, given that it takes two to argue.
>
> > Read his posts. It looks like he's arguing,
>
> With whom?
>
> > in fact he is arguing,
>
> With whom?
>
> > but he's getting no response.
>
> Not much of an argument, is it?
>
> > He's certainly attempting to argue.
>
> Do make up your mind.
>
> >>> I think vs. is justified.
>
> >> What you think is irrelevant; the fact is that it takes two to argue.
>
> >>>>>>> It's moved on since, hence the new suggestion for the name.
>
> >>>>>> You're erroneously presupposing that it was origionally [sic] a
> >>>>>> "tholen.vs.malloy" thread.
>
> >>>>> I have now restated a more accurate version.
>
> >>>> Not accurate enough.
>
> >>> I believe it is, but that's just an opinion.
>
> >> What you believe is irrelevant; the fact is that it takes two to argue.
>
> > See above.
>
> I see an inconsistency above. First you said he is arguing, but then
> you said he's attempting to argue.
>
> >>>>> It has now moved on from that.
>
> >>>> Actually, the situation hasn't changed. I'm still ignoring Malloy
> >>>> like I was at the beginning of the thread, and Malloy is still posting
> >>>> his ridiculous responses like he was at the beginning of the thread.
> >>>> He hasn't moved on.
>
> >>> That part of the situation has changed, but Marty has since joined in,
> >>> which means that some parts of the situation have changed.
>
> >> Not the parts relevant to you calling it "malloy vs tholen".
>
> > How about
> >
> > malloy vs (tholen)
> >
> > to indicate the subject, but also to indicate that you are not taking
> > part.
>
> How about "malloy vs ", to indicate that nobody else is taking part.
> Why specify me?
You're such a victim in all this.
>
> > But, I don't think usenat likes (s in names.
>
> What you think is irrelevant.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: James Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Richard Stallman Streaming Video - Part II
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:52:29 GMT
Richard Stallman Streaming Video - Part II:
ArsDigita University recently released a video of the second half of
Richard Stallman's speech on the Free Software Movement and the
GNU/Linux Operating System that he gave at ArsDigita University on 2
January 2001. You will need RealPlayer to view these videos :-).
Part I: http://aduni.org/video/01-02-01Colloq1.ram
Part II: http://aduni.org/video/01-02-01Colloq2.ram
James Thornton
_________________________________________________________
MIT Web Curriculum Free Online (Nexus Watch October 2000)
--> http://www.jamesthornton.com/nexuswatch/20001018.html
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: Tim Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux headache
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:02:03 +0000
"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> Andy Walker wrote:
> >
> > I don't want to start a flame war over this but there is one thing I
> > want to get off my chest.
> > Linux is an absolute nightmare to learn.
>
> At the age of 17, I, and my 150 fellow classmates in EE263 (Intro to Pascal)
> at Purdue, with nothing more than a sheet of instructions on how to use the
> following commands:
>
> ex (to edit)
> cat (to display a file on the screen)
> ls (to list files in a directory)
> lpr (to print a file on a line printer)
>
You were supposed to find the compiler and linker without
being told about 'man'? - That's harsh!
Tim.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Lookout! The winvocates have a new FUD strategy!
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:59:54 -0500
Pete Goodwin wrote:
>
> Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>
> > Star Office is FREELY DOWNLOADABLE FROM SUN, you MORON.
>
> He was talking about out of the box, o buffoon.
And your point is?
>
> > It's also included in SuSE, and several other distributions.
>
> We were talking about Linux Mandrake, o incredibly stupid one.
>
SO WHAT? Star Office is Freely Downloadable, no matter what distro you buy.
You can even get it for LoseDOS.
> --
> Pete, running KDE2 on Linux Mandrake 7.2
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 Major Advance
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:03:18 -0500
Charlie Ebert wrote:
>
> In article <hkKd6.26856$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chad Myers wrote:
> >
> >So basically, you're attempting to take on the entire scientific
> >community and the basis for every reasearch study going on in the
> >western world, just because you can't accept that Linux just doesn't
> >perform as well as other OSen?
> >
> >
> >-Chad
> >
> >
>
> If all those brain scientists would only listen to Chad!
> We could move on from the H-bomb to the I-bomb, maybe
> even the J-bomb by now!
Chad had the Zzzzzzzzzzzzz-Bomb when he was in school.
>
> Dammit!
>
> Charlie
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: Milton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: M$ websites down again - Problem solved -> use Linux!
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:08:15 -0500
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:31:31 -0600, "Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hardly vaporware. I'm using the beta as we speak. You can too.
Oh really
Corel already ported it to Linux? ;)
Besides I don't use alpha software.
What M$ calls beta, is alpha quality
What M$ calls production code, is beta quality.
What is ironic about this thread, is the DNS servers that M$ now relies
to operate it's websites, are only *beta level* Linux kernels from the
2.1 series.
--
«««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Milton B. Hewitt
CAUCE Member - http://www.cauce.org
Proud supporter of the Microsoft Boycott Campaign
http://www.vcnet.com/bms/
«««««««««««««««««««««««»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: NTFS Limitations (Was: RE: Red hat becoming illegal?)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:04:51 -0500
J Sloan wrote:
>
> Chad Myers wrote:
>
> > "J Sloan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> > > Actually, most Linux users are more technical than
> > > the average windows user, and furthermore, most
> > > Linux users were windows users at one time. So the
> > > idea that a Linux user can't tell the difference between
> > > 95 and nt is just plain silly.
> >
> > You'd be surprised. Many of your ilk post to this newsgroup and begin
> > bashing WinNT and 2K for faults of 9x.
>
> You know nothing of my ilk.
>
> > We have to continually explain
> > to them that, yes, NT/2K do have a fully 32-bit pre-emptive multitasking
> > kernel and yes, they do have a fully virtualized memory space, and yes,
> > they do have a full security implementation including process isolation,
> > required user-logon and pervasive security checking at all levels just
> > like in Unix, only better.
>
> Not, not better than Unix - still trying to catch up.
>
> Is it true that windows 2000 finally got filesystem quotas
> somewhat similar to what Linux has had for years?
>
(specifically...over 2 DECADES).
> jjs
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:05:34 -0500
"." wrote:
>
> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "." wrote:
> >>
> >> Steve Mading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > : You misspelled, "Leftist ACLU fantasies"
> >>
> >> > : The Constitution does NOT prohibit mixing the state and religion, it
> >> > : merely prohibits:
> >>
> >> > : A) the ESTABLISHMENT of a religion, and
> >> > : B) government interference in religious organizations.
> >>
> >> > : Freedom OF religion =/= Freedom FROM religion.
> >>
> >> > The ability to be free from religion if you so choose is a
> >> > prerequisite for real freedom of religion. If everyone is
> >> > required to be religious, then you've got government regulations
> >> > of what does and doesn't count as a religion, and *that* is
> >> > definately a case of government interference in religious
> >> > organizations. One necessary (but not sufficient) test to see
> >> > if government is keeping it's grubby little hands off of
> >> > religions is to see what happens to those who choose not to
> >> > participate in a religion.
> >>
> >> I do not want bush spending my tax dollars on religious organizations.
>
> > The President can't spend anything....only Congress.
>
> > Which is why the "Reagan Deficit" is a misnomer....it was the TIP O'NEIL
> > deficit.
> > [All spending bills MUST start in the House]
>
> But they can brought down by the senate AND president before they see
> the light of day.
Dem's ALSO controlled the Senate...
>
> Place responsibility where it is due---on EVERYONE.
>
> -----.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:07:20 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:39:54 -0600, Erik Funkenbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >"Steve Mading" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:957i20$h7q$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> : Deism is a belief in the existance of God.
> >>
> >> One that has nothing to do with Christianity. Which is kind of
> >> important considering what this subthread is about.
> >
> >By that token, Judaism isn't welcome in this country either, which is
> >ridiculous.
> >
> >> : Atheism is a belief in the non-existance of God.
> >>
> >> No it isn't. It's the lack of the belief that god does exist.
> >> To call this a belief rather than simple default skepticism is
> >> to assume that god existing is the default, which is circular.
> >
> >No, Atheism is the believe that god doesn't exist. Agnosticism is the lack
> >of a belief in god.
> >
> >Atheism is active disbelief, Agnisticism is skepticism about the belief.
>
> No, atheism is lack of belief.
No..that's agnosticism.
A theism *IS* a belief....specifically a belief in the null postulate.
> If you null hypothesis is that
> deities and the supernatural don't exist, then no active
> 'belief' is not necessary.
>
> Agnosticism is more of a position that the issue is unsolved
> or unsolvabe.
i.e. "I don't know"
>
> --
>
> Having seen my prefered platform being eaten away by vendorlock and
> the Lemming mentality in the past, I have a considerable motivation to
> use Free Software that has nothing to do with ideology and everything
> to do with pragmatism.
>
> Free Software is the only way to level the playing field against a
> market leader that has become immune to market pressures.
>
> The other alternatives are giving up and just allowing the mediocrity
> to walk all over you or to see your prefered product die slowly.
>
> |||
> / | \
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Gates Vaccine
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:09:53 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Just saw this thread. If only he would spend this amount of money
> protecting his OS's and applications from virus'. :-)
>
> Why is it that BG has to tell the world what a great guy he is giving
> these relatively tiny amounts of money, considering his enormous
> wealth, when others do it without all the fanfare. I remember a
> documentary on ex-beatle Paul. It mentioned, as a small side note,
> that he had given a lot of money over many years to many charities but
> always gave the money anonymously. What does BG expect to gain from
> this I wonder?
Sympathy.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charlie Ebert)
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: NTFS Limitations (Was: RE: Red hat becoming illegal?)
Reply-To: Charlie Ebert:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:14:52 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>J Sloan wrote:
>>
>> Chad Myers wrote:
>>
>> > "J Sloan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> >
>> > > Actually, most Linux users are more technical than
>> > > the average windows user, and furthermore, most
>> > > Linux users were windows users at one time. So the
>> > > idea that a Linux user can't tell the difference between
>> > > 95 and nt is just plain silly.
>> >
>> > You'd be surprised. Many of your ilk post to this newsgroup and begin
>> > bashing WinNT and 2K for faults of 9x.
>>
>> You know nothing of my ilk.
>>
>> > We have to continually explain
>> > to them that, yes, NT/2K do have a fully 32-bit pre-emptive multitasking
>> > kernel and yes, they do have a fully virtualized memory space, and yes,
>> > they do have a full security implementation including process isolation,
>> > required user-logon and pervasive security checking at all levels just
>> > like in Unix, only better.
>>
***TEST***
Write one very simple program in C which computes all prime
numbers between 1 and 100,000,000. Don't do anything but
compute your prime numbers and display them to the screen.
Drive IO tends to scew this test.
Next, create a dos batch to launch this program 4 times,
each displaying the results in a dos box.
If you have a true multitasking OS, you should see program
1 finish before 2 and so on. It should start and end
in the sequence 1,2,3,4....
Windows can't do that.
Linux can. Linux is true multitasking.
This IS a crucial reason why when the going get's
tuff, Windows just bluescreens.
It has no sense of timing of it's internal processes.
>> Not, not better than Unix - still trying to catch up.
>>
>> Is it true that windows 2000 finally got filesystem quotas
>> somewhat similar to what Linux has had for years?
>>
>
>(specifically...over 2 DECADES).
>
>
>> jjs
>
>
>--
>Aaron R. Kulkis
>Unix Systems Engineer
>DNRC Minister of all I survey
>ICQ # 3056642
>
>
>H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> you are lazy, stupid people"
>
>I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
>J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
>
>A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
>
>B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> direction that she doesn't like.
>
>C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
>D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> ...despite (C) above.
>
>E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> her behavior improves.
>
>F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
>G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: MS to Enforce Registration - or Else
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:11:40 -0500
Johan Kullstam wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Nick Condon wrote:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harlan Grove) wrote in <94si7f$7nq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > >Absolutely true. It's how we define 'freedom'. For those in the US of
> > > >Libertarian bent, Microsoft can do what it wants to within certain
> > > >legal bounds (which it's overstepped, IMO).
> > >
> > > Microsoft has a centrally planned, state granted, exclusive monopoly.
> > > That's not very libertarian.
> >
> > No, it's not "state granted" If it was, they wouldn't have been
> > CONVICTED of criminal conduct in Federal Court.
>
> sure it is. what do you think copyright is? copyright is a state
> enforced monopoly. no state enforcement, no copyright -- look at
> middle/far east.
By that definition EVERYBODY is a monopolist, as you retain the copyright
for whatever you create.
>
> > > Americans are so busy watching and being suspicious of their government,
> > > they've missed the big corporations sneaking up behind them, until it's too
> > > late and there's nothing left to do but bite the pillow.
>
> > Must be why Microsoft has been REPEATEDLY **CONVICTED** in Federal
> > court for behavior nearly identical to that which got IBM REPEATEDLY
> > ***CONVICTED*** of crimes back in the 1960's-80's.
>
> that too.
>
> --
> J o h a n K u l l s t a m
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Don't Fear the Penguin!
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
