Linux-Advocacy Digest #565, Volume #33 Thu, 12 Apr 01 23:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Gunner ©)
Re: Undeniable proof that Aaron R. Kulkis is a hypocrite, and a (Goldhammer)
Re: t. max devlin: kook (GreyCloud)
Re: Blame it all on Microsoft (Eric Smith)
Re: lack of linux billionaires explained in one easy message (GreyCloud)
Re: Inktomi Webmap -- Apache has 60% now. (Tim Kelley)
Re: Inktomi Webmap -- Apache has 60% now. (Tim Kelley)
Re: What's your take on this story? (Microsoft opening up the MSOffice (Chris
Ahlstrom)
Re: Article: Windows XP won't support USB 2.0 (Tim Kelley)
Re: Undeniable proof that Aaron R. Kulkis is a hypocrite, and a (Chris Ahlstrom)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (GreyCloud)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (GreyCloud)
Re: Undeniable proof that Aaron R. Kulkis is a hypocrite, and a (Goldhammer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Gunner © <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:53:31 -0700
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:47:32 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Rob Robertson wrote:
>>
>> Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>> >
>> > Rob Robertson wrote:
>> > >
>> > > silverback wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:22:42 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam A. Kersh)
>> > > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > <snip>
>> > >
>> > > > >I've come to the conclusion based on silverback's posts over the
>> > > > >last year that he is a closet communist. He touts "welfare" aka
>> > > > >redistribution of wealth through "progressive taxation."
>> > > >
>> > > > sorry progressive taxation is not redistribution
>> > >
>> > > Poor Glen doesn't know whether he's a Fascist (e.g., the state take-over
>> > > of the California electricity industry) or a Communist (everything else)!
>> > > But, that's the problem with labels; a Bloody Collectivist like Glen will
>> > > twist and contort himself a million different ways in order to disguise
>> > > the liberty-destroying nature of his politics.
>> > >
>> > > What *is* happening in America today? Are we feeling the effects of
>> > > 'democratic socialism', 'liberal fascism', or something else entirely?
>> > >
>> > > From http://www.taxguru.org/politics/Commies.htm;
>> > >
>> > > COMMUNIST MANIFESTO
>> > >
>> > > Published in February 1848 by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
>> > >
>> > > Following are the ten measures needed for a Communist society, exactly
>> > > as published in the English language translation.
>> > >
>> > > 1. Expropriation of property in land and application of all rents of
>> > > land to public purposes.
>> > >
>> > > 2. A heavy progressive tax.
>> > >
>> > > 3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.
>> > >
>> > > 4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
>> > >
>> > > 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of
>> > > a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
>> > >
>> > > 6. Centralization of transport in the hands of the State.
>> > >
>> > > 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the
>> > > State; the bringing into cultivation of wastelands, and the
>> > > improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
>> > >
>> > > 8. Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of industrial
>> > > armies, especially for agriculture.
>> > >
>> > > 9. Combination of agriculture with industry, promotion of the gradual
>> > > elimination of the contradictions between town and countryside.
>> > >
>> > > 10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of
>> > > children's factory labour in its present form. Combination of
>> > > education with industrial production, etc.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The constitution of the United States is currently an odd admixture
>> > > of fascism, socialism, and resilient pockets of laissez-faire capitalism.
>> > > It defies an easy categorization because many of the previous forms of
>> > > collectivism have transformed themselves, as these freedom-destroying
>> > > ideologies are wont to do. That is why I refer to the current structure
>> > > as 'AmSoc'.
>> >
>> > Repealing the 17th Aemendment (it took the Senate out of the hands of the
>> > state legislatures, and turned it into a super-House-of-Representatives
>> > by mandating popular elections) is absolutely essential.
>>
>> I agree, and during the Senate's disgraceful actions in trying
>> Clinton's impeachment, I'd put much of the blame on the 17th
>> for the reasons you make here.
>>
>> > When the senate was chosen by state legislatures, the Federal
>> > government was kept in check, and socialism had an insurmountable
>> > wall to overcome.
>>
>> Plus, it was an integral part of the federal plan for government,
>> that one body (the House) would reflect the interests of the people
>> and the other body (the Senate) would reflect the interests of the
>> sovereign states.
>>
>> > If you TRULY want to see an end to the leviathan Federal Government,
>> > then get the 17th Amendment repealed. When that happens, you'll
>> > see that the House of Representatives will no longer have the
>> > ability to commit such outrages such committing blackmail upon
>> > the state legislatures by holding federal gas tax revenues
>> > (earmarked for federal highways) hostage until they cry uncle.
>>
>> I don't know how far it would actually go in achieving that, but
>> I agree that it is a necessary step. Plus, Yeadon's a Communist.
>
>
>Let's take a nice, Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon style pure-democratic vote:
>
>All for putting Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon up against the wall, and
>filling him full of lead, say "AYE!" All opposed, say "NAY"
>
>
>Let's see how much Sliverdick likes democracy now.
AYE! And Ill donate the ammo!
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> > --
>> > Aaron R. Kulkis
>> > Unix Systems Engineer
>> > DNRC Minister of all I survey
>> > ICQ # 3056642
>>
>> _
>> Rob Robertson
>>
>> "It's nice to share."
>> -Jot
Taxation is the art of plucking the goose so as to obtain the largest
amount of feathers with the smallest amount of hissing.
-- Jean-Baptiste Colbert
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Goldhammer)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Undeniable proof that Aaron R. Kulkis is a hypocrite, and a
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 01:53:58 GMT
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:29:30 GMT,
Chris Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:19:46 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Goldhammer)
>wrote:
>>A full-featured BSOD is one
>>you can't recover from.
>
>I have the screensaver for NT. Takes a look at the system and
>generates a realistic BSOD, as well as locking out the keyboard and
>mouse for the first 15 seconds. Nice :)
>
>It used to be available at www.sysinternals.com If you google search
>on BSOD screensaver you should find it.
That's just a poor third-party imitation
of the real MS BSOD (tm). It doesn't
have the full functionality of the real
thing. Missing are two important technological
innovations: randomness and true unrecoverability.
I don't think we'll be seeing a clone
of the MS BSOD (tm) software for Linux
unless the kernel is patched to provide
better kernel panic support. This is,
of course, a design flaw in the Linux
kernel. Maybe they'll fix it in 2.5.
--
Don't think you are. Know you are.
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: t. max devlin: kook
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:56:44 -0700
"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> Anonymous wrote:
> >
> > t. max dumbass:
> > > Said Anonymous in alt.destroy.microsoft on Sun, 8 Apr 2001 06:30:34
> > > -0600;
> > > >T. Max Devlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> Anything with a command line is easier to learn, of course, because it
> > > >> is simpler
> > > >
> > > >i just wanted to see that again
> > >
> > > And I bet the last thing in the world you wanted was for me to explain
> > > it. You're such a putz, pretending like typing is somehow impossible.
> >
> > now that you mention it i wonder how many people can type with sufficient
> > accuracy to effectively make use of the command line...
>
> Millions of IQ-100 secretaries were able to achieve sufficient
> accuracy for DECADES.
Correct! And with the new mouse interface... its carpal tunnel syndrome
time.
(My wife got it from that damn mouse! Its very painful.)
>
> > but what i originally had in mind was the difference between memorizing
> > a whole series of cryptic commands and just pulling down the menus and
> > seeing what they say.
>
> pulling down menus is slow, and leads to tired hand/wrist/arm, and
> as such, is ONLY suitable for newbies.
>
> Since most people graduate from newbie stage within a couple of months,
> LOCKING them into menus only is a hindrance to productivity AND annoying
> to the user.
>
> Why do you think so many Windows users HATE windows.
>
> > jackie 'anakin' tokeman
> >
> > men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
> > more even than death
> > - bertrand russell
>
> --
> Aaron R. Kulkis
> Unix Systems Engineer
> DNRC Minister of all I survey
> ICQ # 3056642
>
> K: Truth in advertising:
> Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
> Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
> Special Interest Sierra Club,
> Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
>
> J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
>
> I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
> H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> you are lazy, stupid people"
>
> G: Knackos...you're a retard.
>
> F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
> E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> her behavior improves.
>
> D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> ...despite (C) above.
>
> C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
> B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> direction that she doesn't like.
>
> A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
--
V
------------------------------
From: Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.theory,comp.arch,comp.object
Subject: Re: Blame it all on Microsoft
Date: 12 Apr 2001 19:00:41 -0700
Chad Everett wrote:
> Bill Gates and Paul Allen did it all.
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Considering that they're both a lying sacks of shit, caught red-handed
> committing perjury in Federal Court....let's just say that i don't
> trust a word they say.
I asked:
> When do you claim that Paul Allen committed perjury?
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Every single Microsoft officer was cought in at least one lie.
> This is why Jackson later referred to them as 'worse than drug dealers.'
I wrote:
> You didn't answer the question. What statement did Paul Allen make that
> you claim is perjury?
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't know, I was working. However, even the pro-Microsoft press
> admitted that EVERY MICROSOFT OFFICER who appeared on the witness
> stand was caught in at least one lie.
>
> Allen testified, and he's a Microsoft officer.
>
> Do the math.
What math? What you've said STILL doesn't explain why you think Paul
Allen committed perjury. You're almost adept enough at dodging questions
to become a politician; keep practicing. But around here we don't fall
for it.
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: lack of linux billionaires explained in one easy message
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:06:05 -0700
Anonymous wrote:
>
> t. max dumbass:
> > Said Anonymous in alt.destroy.microsoft on Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:33:29
> > [...]
> > >> So, what you're saying is that a large portion of the population is dumb as
> > >> a post, if not dumber.
> > >
> > >no, i'm saying that hostility to consumer needs is a bug not a feature.
> >
> > No, 'hostility to consumer needs' is a smoke-screen for apologizing for
> > the monopoly, not a supportable argument.
>
> if microsoft were really a monopoly linux would not exist.
> as to your hostility to consumer needs
> you're soaking in it.
>
> > >> You then go on to prove your own membership in this
> > >> elite crew by listing some numbers and making the assumption that some of
> > >> these numbers being higher than others determine which system is better, and
> > >> that this entire post is somehow related to the ease of use.
> > >
> > >if the goal is to defeat microsoft and its emperor ease of use is job
> > >one.
> >
> > Actually, preventing illegal activity is job one. There is no job two.
>
> translation: linux cannot win in the free market so i am hoping the
> jackbooted thugs will destroy the winner making way for the losers ie
> linux headcases
>
> > >if, on the other hand, you prefer to bitch and moan about the
> > >ignorant endluzers who don't appreciate your brilliance, well
> > >please do go on.
> >
> > Like you were? We don't do that.
>
> are you claiming that linux users respect the majority of people who
> prefer windows?
> too funny!
>
> > >just don't expect unix to get anywhere on the desktop anytime soon.
> >
> > I don't. Unless the federal court's decision comes anytime soon.
>
> what was that you were saying about freedom of choice?
> jackie 'anakin' tokeman
>
> men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
> more even than death
> - bertrand russell
Just another no-name. Poking fun and likes to watch is all.
Just like aunt martha... I wanna watch! I wanna watch!
--
V
------------------------------
From: Tim Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Inktomi Webmap -- Apache has 60% now.
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 02:12:14 GMT
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
Well, I've contributed a little, I've installed three apache servers in the
last year at work. I love apache!
I wonder how much this "60%" inclues virtual servers. There are many
apache servers which service hundreds of domains.
> Good news! Apache now has 60.33% of the total server market,
> compared to Microsoft-IIS's 25.26% share. Netscape-Enterprise
> is a distant third at 3.79%.
>
> http://www.inktomi.com/webmap/
>
> Unfortunately, there is no information regarding secure webservers.
>
--
Tim Kelley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Tim Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Inktomi Webmap -- Apache has 60% now.
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 02:20:16 GMT
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
Just a note about security.
Apache does have a far better record, having 60% of the market and about 5%
of the defacements, with IIS having ~20% of the market and 80% of
defacements.
MS advocates will claim this is due to poor admins, but the truth is that
since MS includes features that break applications in their updates, it may
well be impossible for an NT admin to update his server!
for example, I am running IIS 3 for one application. It is the sort of app
that has to be open to the internet and is only certified to run with IIS3.
I am too scared to install any service pack higher than 3 on this server
because the application is quirky enough as it is.
You don't have these sort of problems with linux / apache. If you get
cracked, there's usually no excuse. This does not hold for NT.
> Good news! Apache now has 60.33% of the total server market,
> compared to Microsoft-IIS's 25.26% share. Netscape-Enterprise
> is a distant third at 3.79%.
>
> http://www.inktomi.com/webmap/
>
> Unfortunately, there is no information regarding secure webservers.
>
--
Tim Kelley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Chris Ahlstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: What's your take on this story? (Microsoft opening up the MSOffice
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 02:21:50 GMT
Jan Johanson wrote:
>
> Besides, XML is terribly space inefficient - if MS did switch to pure XML
> output you guys would simply change your bashing to then say a) oh, so they
> changed their format AGAIN and b) oh, their files are so big and load so
> slowly!
No need for the "if" there... Word 2000 already has changed formats AGAIN,
their files are huge (HTML is about as efficient as the Word format), they
load so slowly, the product stalls in responding to commands for no apparent
reason, it's buggy, and you have to pay a lot for it unless you steal it.
Chris
--
This application has crashed unexpectedly.
Hit OK to terminate, or Cancel to debug it.
Doh!
------------------------------
From: Tim Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Article: Windows XP won't support USB 2.0
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 02:24:12 GMT
Dave Martel wrote:
This is actually good news. USB2 is inferior to firewire as is SCSI.
They will support usb 1, and there are no usb 2 devices yet anyway.
USB 2.0 is intels ploy to kill firewire, which is clearly superior.
It doesn't have anything to do with USB 1.0
Hopefully firewire will kill both scsi, usb 1, and usb 2, IDE, floppy and
parallel ports in one stroke. Firewire is something we really need.
> <http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1006-200-5558916.html>
>
> "The Redmond, Wash.-based software maker said it will not include
> support for USB 2.0, the latest iteration of the universal serial bus
> connection technology, in Windows XP, its next-generation operating
> system expected later this year. Microsoft will instead throw its
> support behind IEEE 1394, also known as FireWire, which was developed
> by Apple. "
>
> Microsoft says it's a quality issue, which is nonsense (what -
> Microsoft, concerned with quality? <g>). A Register article a few
> weeks ago asserted that MS's real reason is that USB doesn't offer a
> content-control mechanism, and 1394 does.
>
>
--
Tim Kelley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Chris Ahlstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Undeniable proof that Aaron R. Kulkis is a hypocrite, and a
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 02:28:12 GMT
Jan Johanson wrote:
>
> No, the fact that "THREE other people" (your claim) have demonstrated how
> easy something is which you cannot do only continues to make you sound
> incompetent and a liar. If it's so easy, and you do it to throw people off,
> then just go ahead and do it. I thought linux was the common' mans open
> source software and getting in to the code is effortless and everyone does
> it. a $150k a year genius like yourself should be able to write a script to
> do it for you while you sleep...
JJ, you're making absolutely no sense here. I'm wasting my time
reading your posts, and answering. I guess you get some pleasure out
of it, so continue to knock yourself out.
Chris
--
This application has crashed unexpectedly.
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:27:44 -0700
silverback wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:51:34 -0400, Rob Robertson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >silverback wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:22:42 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam A. Kersh)
> >> wrote:
> >
> ><snip>
> >
> >> >I've come to the conclusion based on silverback's posts over the
> >> >last year that he is a closet communist. He touts "welfare" aka
> >> >redistribution of wealth through "progressive taxation."
> >>
> >> sorry progressive taxation is not redistribution
> >
> > Poor Glen doesn't know whether he's a Fascist (e.g., the state take-over
>
> too bad fraud I'm neither I'm a liberal.
>
> >of the California electricity industry) or a Communist (everything else)!
> >But, that's the problem with labels; a Bloody Collectivist like Glen will
> >twist and contort himself a million different ways in order to disguise
> >the liberty-destroying nature of his politics.
>
> allowing corporations to price gouge consumers has nothing to do with
> being a collectivist fraud.
> In fact the real collectivist are the fucking corporations that are
> bleeding the people.
>
> >
> > What *is* happening in America today? Are we feeling the effects of
> >'democratic socialism', 'liberal fascism', or something else entirely?
> >
> >
> >From http://www.taxguru.org/politics/Commies.htm;
> >
> >
> >COMMUNIST MANIFESTO
> >
> >Published in February 1848 by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
> >
> >Following are the ten measures needed for a Communist society, exactly
> >as published in the English language translation.
> >
> >
> > 1. Expropriation of property in land and application of all rents of
> > land to public purposes.
> >
> > 2. A heavy progressive tax.
> >
> > 3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.
> >
> > 4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
> >
> > 5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of
> > a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
> >
> > 6. Centralization of transport in the hands of the State.
> >
> > 7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the
> > State; the bringing into cultivation of wastelands, and the
> > improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
> >
> > 8. Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of industrial
> > armies, especially for agriculture.
> >
> > 9. Combination of agriculture with industry, promotion of the gradual
> > elimination of the contradictions between town and countryside.
> >
> > 10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of
> > children's factory labour in its present form. Combination of
> > education with industrial production, etc.
> >
> >
> > The constitution of the United States is currently an odd admixture
> >of fascism, socialism, and resilient pockets of laissez-faire capitalism.
> >It defies an easy categorization because many of the previous forms of
> >collectivism have transformed themselves, as these freedom-destroying
> >ideologies are wont to do. That is why I refer to the current structure
> >as 'AmSoc'.
> >
> >
> >_
> >Rob Robertson
> >
> >
> > "Thus the fear of concentration camps and the resulting insight
> > into the nature of total domination might serve to invalidate
> > all obsolete political differentiations from right to left and
> > to introduce beside and above them the politically most important
> > yardstick for judging events in our time, namely: whether they
> > serve totalitarian domination or not."
> >
> > - Hannah Arendt, _The Origins of Totalitarianism_, p. 442
>
> ***********************************************
>
> GDY Weasel
> emailers remove the spam buster
>
> For those seeking enlightenment visit the White Rose at
>
> http://www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/whiterose.htm
>
> *********************************************
Gawd! I need more beer to continue reading this crap!
I've tried real hard... used boy butter and all... I just can't get my
head up my ASS
far enough to see your point of VIEW!!
--
V
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:30:30 -0700
"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>
> Rob Robertson wrote:
> >
> > silverback wrote:
> > >
> > > Rob Robertson wrote:
> > >
> > > > silverback wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Sam A. Kersh wrote:
> > > >
> > > ><snip>
> > > >
> > > >> > I've come to the conclusion based on silverback's posts over the
> > > >> > last year that he is a closet communist. He touts "welfare" aka
> > > >> > redistribution of wealth through "progressive taxation."
> > > >>
> > > >> sorry progressive taxation is not redistribution
> > > >
> > > > Poor Glen doesn't know whether he's a Fascist (e.g., the state take-over
> > > > of the California electricity industry) or a Communist (everything else)!
> > >
> > > too bad [Scott Erb = disingenuous fraud] I'm neither I'm a liberal.
> >
> > And just what are you 'liberating', Glen? You advocate the state-sponsored
> > theft of 95% of the income of anyone who earns over $500,000, support a
> > government take-over of private industry (after government regulations
> > assured their bankruptcy), advocate the suppression of free speech via
> > Denial of Service attacks against political enemies on the Internet and
> > firehosing preachers in public spaces,...
> >
> > You're a Bloody Collectivist, Yeadon.
> >
> > > >But, that's the problem with labels; a Bloody Collectivist like Glen will
> > > >twist and contort himself a million different ways in order to disguise
> > > >the liberty-destroying nature of his politics.
> > >
> > > allowing corporations to price gouge consumers has nothing to do with
> > > being a collectivist [Scott Erb = disingenuous fraud].
> >
> > The key is competition, Glen. That's what laissez-faire capitalism is
> > all about, you see; without government regulations preventing some new
> > company from competing, entrepreneurs have an incentive to innovate and
> > provide goods and services at a lower cost than that provided by the
> > 'price gougers'.
> >
> > > In fact the real collectivist are the fucking corporations that are
> > > bleeding the people.
> >
> > No corporation tells me to put down a 10X 'scope probe and pick up a
> > shovel to dig a canal, or dig potatoes out of the fields. I'm free to
> > do what I want, as long as idiotic government regulations aren't out
> > to deprive me of my freedom (or electricity!).
> >
> > And while you're here, why aren't you using a small, inexpensive wind
> > mill for all your electricity needs at home?
>
> Hell, why is he WASTING electricity posting to USENET.
>
The care-givers are about to put him to bed now. They give him BUSPAR
regularly for his outbursts.
> Actions speak louder than words.
>
> Like most self-title-LIBERals, the only person's liberty who he respects
> is his own. His true desire is that everybody else be slaves pandering to
> his every beck and call.
>
> Isn't that right, sliverdick....
>
> --
> Aaron R. Kulkis
> Unix Systems Engineer
> DNRC Minister of all I survey
> ICQ # 3056642
>
> K: Truth in advertising:
> Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
> Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
> Special Interest Sierra Club,
> Anarchist Members of the ACLU
> Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
> The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
> Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
>
> J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
> The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
> also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
>
> I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
> challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
> between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
> Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
>
> H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
> premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
> you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
> you are lazy, stupid people"
>
> G: Knackos...you're a retard.
>
> F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
> adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
>
> E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
> her behavior improves.
>
> D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
> ...despite (C) above.
>
> C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
>
> B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
> method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
> direction that she doesn't like.
>
> A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
--
V
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Goldhammer)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.ibm.games.strategic,alt.games.bc3000ad
Subject: Re: Undeniable proof that Aaron R. Kulkis is a hypocrite, and a
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 02:35:17 GMT
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 02:21:41 GMT, Brent R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Btw, is Derek still married to Bill Huffman?
>
>Hehe hadn't heard that one. Just mentioning either of their names in a
>./strategic NG is guaranteed to bring 1000+ posts.
>
>I'm a follower of this NG, and c.s.i.p.g.s (I think that's it)... and on
>certain days the BC3k flamewar is the best entertainment available
>(which is either a sad comment on the entertainment industry or my life,
>hehe).
Seriously though, I've heard that Derek has been
under a lot of pressure to GPL the source code
to his free version of BC3K, but he has some moral
reservations about this, because the instant his
brilliant AILOG technology gets out, the current
crop of game developers will become obsolete overnight
and out of a job. Cleve Blakemore may be the driving
force behind all this. Cleve has been itching to get
get a firsthand look at Derek's AILOG, so he can
fill in the last pieces of his own work, which have
been eluding him thus far.
--
Don't think you are. Know you are.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
