Linux-Advocacy Digest #621, Volume #33           Sun, 15 Apr 01 04:13:03 EDT

Contents:
  Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.  (Mathew)
  Re: So much for modules in Linux! (Tim Hanson)
  Re: there's always a bigger fool (Tim Hanson)
  Re: So much for modules in Linux! ("Tom Wilson")
  Re: Who votes for Sliverdick to be executed: AYEs:4  NAYS:0 ("Alex Chaihorsky")
  Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. ("Alex 
Chaihorsky")
  Re: Linux = CHOICE! (Pete Goodwin)
  Re: So much for modules in Linux! (Tim Hanson)
  Re: To Eric FunkenBush (GreyCloud)
  Re: Why Bill Gates Is Ramming His Thick Meaty Cock Up Torvald's Weak   (GreyCloud)
  Re: Communism ("Alex Chaihorsky")
  Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Gunner©)
  Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this , day. (Gunner©)
  Re: To Eric FunkenBush ("Tom Wilson")
  Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) ("Aaron R. Kulkis")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Crossposted-To: 
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
From: Mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. 
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 16:36:54 +1000



On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Jim Richardson wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 03:51:42 GMT, 
>  silverback, in the persona of <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>  brought forth the following words...:
> 
> >On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:24:34 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Goldhammer wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> On Mon, 09 Apr 2001 13:33:15 -0400,
> >>> Rob Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> > Right. Fascism is characterized by the *state-directed* control of
> >>> >the economy,
> >>> 
> >>> Hmm. Sounds like communism.
> >>
> >>Precisely.
> >>
> >>Communism and Fascism are merely different sides of the same coin.
> >
> >bullshit you lying sack of shit. Fascism is the polar opposite of
> >communism. They have nothing in common.
> >
> 
> 
> Fascicsm=control by a ruling oligarchy that murders it's population.
> Communism=control by a ruling oligarchy that murders it's population.

 What about Capitalist Fascist dictatorships like the 
Philippines,particulary under Marcos.


> 
> wow! no similarity there!
> 
> -- 
> Jim Richardson
>       Anarchist, pagan and proud of it
> WWW.eskimo.com/~warlock
>       Linux, because life's too short for a buggy OS.
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 23:37:50 -0700
From: Tim Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: So much for modules in Linux!

Tom Wilson wrote:
> 
> "Tim Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Tom Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > "Matthew Gardiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > > > As for SuSE Linux.  I have SuSE Linux 7.1 running, and compared to
> > > > Redhat, SuSE is awsome. Hence, the reason I donot understand why SuSE
> > > > has not made bigger inroads into the US market.
> > >
> > > It's absence on store shelves had a lot to do with it, I'm sure. That's
> > > changing though. I picked up mine from OfficeMax a while back. (And,
> without
> > > a doubt, Red Hat could take some lessons from them. Fantastic distro!)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Tom Wilson
> >
> > I've been a SuSE user since 5.? (1, I think).  My first try was
> > Slackware out of a book, then Red Hat, finally settling on SuSE because
> > in my compleat newbieness it was the only one I could actually get X to
> > work on and connect with my (at that time) dial-up ISP.  I'm up to a few
> > boxen plus a laptop on SuSE 7.1
> 
> > My only complaint is that they're too KDE-centric.
> 
> They, like Mandrake, are simply adopting the most popular desktop out there.

...that and the fact that they employ much of the KDE team and have
marketing agreements with Troll Tech...

> Its' definitely the best choice for a newbie (My opinion, of course).

Probably right, especially if they're accustomed to using Windows.  It
always grated me the wrong way, personally.

> Personally, I use FVWM2 most of the time.

My choice, and what I'm using right now.  I use a lot of GNOME
applications, like their text editor and the applet games, but fvwm2 is
small and fast.  The development version supports CORBA.

>The only SuSE complaint I have is
> their decision to place floppy and cdrom mount points directly off of the
> system root instead of off the /mnt directory where they belong. An
> aesthetic gripe, that's all.

I fix it by editing fstab.  There is no problem with it, since yast
umounts and remounts the CD to another point anyway.  

> 
> --
> Tom Wilson

-- 
Our documentation manager was showing her two year old son around the
office.  He was introduced to me, at which time he pointed out that we
were both holding bags of popcorn.  We were both holding bottles of
juice.  But only *__he* had a lollipop.

He asked his mother, "Why doesn't HE have a lollipop?"

Her reply:

        "He can have a lollipop any time he wants to.  That's what it
        means to be a programmer."

______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
   With Seven Servers In California And Texas - The Worlds Uncensored News Source
  

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 23:25:27 -0700
From: Tim Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: there's always a bigger fool

Chad Everett wrote:
> 
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Nomen Nescio"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > the real reason is right in there - the idiot ignored the message you
> > get with every installer telling you to shut down all other programs
> > before continuing with the install.
> > if you think that guy would have got any further with linux you're
> > living in a fucking fantasy world.
> >                         jackie 'anakin' tokeman
> >
> >
> 
> I've chuckled over this since I read it.  Microsoft has done a great
> job of brainwashing:  Hey, if you don't follow the directions on that
> installation dialog and shut down other applications, your entire
> OS get wiped out and you deserve it!  Makes perfect sense!  The fact
> that someone would even try and defend this is just hilarious.

This is comical.  Microsoft lore.  First do a complete backup.  Then,
defrag your hard drive.  Boot your computer and close everything except
what you absolutely need to install the software.  Install the software,
intently watching the screen for the half hour it takes.  On failure,
repeat.  Boot the computer.



-- 
Our documentation manager was showing her two year old son around the
office.  He was introduced to me, at which time he pointed out that we
were both holding bags of popcorn.  We were both holding bottles of
juice.  But only *__he* had a lollipop.

He asked his mother, "Why doesn't HE have a lollipop?"

Her reply:

        "He can have a lollipop any time he wants to.  That's what it
        means to be a programmer."

______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
   With Seven Servers In California And Texas - The Worlds Uncensored News Source
  

------------------------------

From: "Tom Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: So much for modules in Linux!
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 06:38:59 GMT


"Matthew Gardiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Well, Dick Smiths (Aussies will know this shop) has Mandrake, Quay
> Computers has Mandrake, SuSE, Redhat and numerous other linus titles,
> whats best, if you are a newbie, I can promise you that there will
> always be a Linux guru in Quay Computers.  Most people I know order
> linux through an online ordering company, as by the time you know what
> linux and its potential, you would have already made online purchases.

Calling the kids behind the counters of most computer shops, over here,
gurus, qualifies as sarcasm. I have a feeling that most of them only work
there because McDonald's was too intellectually demanding.

--
Tom Wilson




------------------------------

From: "Alex Chaihorsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Who votes for Sliverdick to be executed: AYEs:4  NAYS:0
Date: 15 Apr 2001 06:39:53 GMT
Reply-To: "Alex Chaihorsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Alex Chaihorsky wrote:
> >
> >
> > You are all blood-thirsty bastards. He is mine - he threatened to kick
my
>
> Alex, how about you get a full magazine in your weapon AND
> the honor of firing the first shot.
>
>

Aaron, I must admit, you know how to tempt a guy. But I hate to see
Professor Erb orphaned.
Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin - and now Silverback? You ARE a monster, Kulkis!


Alex, The Compassionate Conservative
(Jeez, I managed to say that without throwing up!)



------------------------------

From: "Alex Chaihorsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: 15 Apr 2001 06:41:39 GMT
Reply-To: "Alex Chaihorsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


"silverback" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >
> >Mathew,
> >
> >I do not support Aaron's choice of words and I think you present yourself
in
> >an honorable way, although I completely disagree with your arguments.
> >However, I have to say that USSR was extremely active in promoting
> >enviro-politics (Green Party in Germany was basically funded by USSR and
> >they never really deny that.
>
> yer lying again quisling

Darling, what planet are you actually from?

Alex Chaihorsky
Reno, NV




------------------------------

From: Pete Goodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux = CHOICE!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 06:29:16 GMT

Ed Allen wrote:

> The choice of multiple alternatives at several different levels like the
> installer, the GUI admin tools, the users desktop, the group of apps in
> a particular distribution, the mixture of GPL vs proprietary, the focus
> of the patches and tunings applied to the standard kernel.

These multiple choices could be Linux undoing.

SuSE does it one way, Mandrake does it another. Can you imagine the 
development nightmare of installing on just two systems that have different 
configuration structure?

Is that why we see a KDE 2.1 RPM for Mandrake, SuSE and RedHat? Why doesn't 
one work for all? Is this what choice brings us to?

> All those choices at those and many other points are why we will always
> have multiple distributions and will eventually see multiple offerings
> from each distribution vendor.

Standardisation works to eliminate the variations and make development life 
easier.

> We have seen only the tip of the diversity landscape so far.  The 2.5
> kernels will bring with them a language allow opening up whole new
> territories of combinations which would have required advice from a
> kernel developer before.

Ack! More confusion, here we come!

> What terrifies the WinTrolls is that knowledgeable choices by consumers
> means that they cannot be forced into three to five piles like the
> ignorant ones can.

There's no terror here! With Windows it becomes rather easy to configure 
things, there in one place. Is that true of Linux? Let me see:

Mandrake:
/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb restart

SuSE:
/etc/init.d/dhclient restart

> That is why they are so adamant that MS is not really a monopoly,
> because their complicity in fleecing the public might get noticed.

Microsoft _is_ a monopoly. The only people who aren't seeing this the last 
time I looked was the court.

> Yes the WinTrolls are strongly attempting to deny that their gravy train
> is about to end and they will need to *work* for a living.  Anything but
> that !

And how does supporting Linux help work for a living? How do you get paid? 
Selling distributions? Not enough! Writing software - most of it is free!

-- 
Pete
Running on SuSE 7.1, Linux 2.4, KDE 2.1
Kylix: the way to go!

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 23:47:52 -0700
From: Tim Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: So much for modules in Linux!

Pete Goodwin wrote:
> 
> Jim Richardson wrote:
> 
> > I suppose it has changed since SuSE 7.0 and all previous versions I have
> > used (6.0 through 6.4) but boot.local is not in /etc/init.d, it's in
> > /sbin/init.d. Can anyone else using 7.1 confirm this? If it has indeed
> > changed, ok, if not, then Pete's claim is rather suspect...
> 
> Wha'ts a configuration file doing in /sbin? Now you're looking suspect!
> 
> On my SuSE 7.1 it's in /etc/rc.d/boot.local

No, it's in /etc/init.d.

> 
> --
> Pete
> Running on SuSE 7.1, Linux 2.4, KDE 2.1
> Kylix: the way to go!

boot.local is a script, not a configuration file, so it's an
executable.  If you look at /etc/init.d/* you'll see they're all
executables, and that's why they were all in /sbin.  This has been an
ongoing argument, right up there with emacs vs. vi, for a long time.
-- 
Our documentation manager was showing her two year old son around the
office.  He was introduced to me, at which time he pointed out that we
were both holding bags of popcorn.  We were both holding bottles of
juice.  But only *__he* had a lollipop.

He asked his mother, "Why doesn't HE have a lollipop?"

Her reply:

        "He can have a lollipop any time he wants to.  That's what it
        means to be a programmer."

______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
   With Seven Servers In California And Texas - The Worlds Uncensored News Source
  

------------------------------

From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: To Eric FunkenBush
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 00:34:20 -0700

Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 16:51:09 -0700, GreyCloud wrote:
> > Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> >>
> >> "Chad Everett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> 
> >> Why do you bitch about MS?  *NOBODY* has released a fully conformant
> >> compiler yet.
> >>
> >> VC7 will conform in almost all ways except Partial Template Specialization
> >> and the export keyword.
> >
> > Which makes it almost useless in a general production environment.
> 
> How many compilers support export anyway ? If that's your criteria, the
> vast majority of compilers are "almost useless in a general production
> environment". BTW, does g++ support partial specialisation ? IIRC it
> doesn't.
> 
> It certainly doesn't support export. BTW, does export have any tangible
> benefits ? (the main thing that would be nice would be a way around the
> "dependency bloat" that template code produces, which one usually needs
> to bypasse using various "firewalling" idioms)
> 
> --
> Donovan Rebbechi * http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/ *
> elflord at panix dot com

There is a section written about partial specializations by Stephan
Prata.

What I gather from what was written about it was this:

"Or you can partially specialize an existing template by providing a
special version for pointers:

  template<class T>       // general version
  class Feeb { ... };
  template<class T*>      // pointer partial specialization
  class Feeb { ... };     // modified code
"

According to what was written it helps the compiler to make choices or
restrict the compilers choices.  I think I'll take my advise from
Stephan Prata or you than someone I don't know much about.

I'll end this thread from my viewpoint: if you try to use the examples
in a well known book using VC++ and find it can't compile it and then
try another compiler on UNIX and it works just fine... I'll take the
UNIX compiler anyday.  I didn't write all those programs for the gov.
before 93 in Automated Test Engineering without any experience.
In production work you have to move fast to give results.  A compiler
that continually is a PITA is worthless in this environment.  What you
do is toss it in the trash can and find one that can do the job.
-- 
V

------------------------------

From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why Bill Gates Is Ramming His Thick Meaty Cock Up Torvald's Weak  
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 00:39:54 -0700

"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> 
> The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
> >
> > In alt.destroy.microsoft, Aaron R. Kulkis
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  wrote
> > on Sat, 14 Apr 2001 20:33:05 -0400
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Kelsey Bjarnason
> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>  wrote
> > >> on Sat, 14 Apr 2001 04:03:01 GMT
> > >> <VZPB6.1982$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> >[snip]
> > >> >
> > >> >"The Ghost In The Machine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> > >> >message
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I can't say Bill Gates is personally responsible for all this, any
> > >> >> more than Adolf Hitler or Josef Stalin was responsible for all
> > >> >> atrocities conducted within their respective regimes.  However, they
> > >> >> might bear general responsibility.
> > >> >
> > >> >Isn't this where Godwin's Law steps in? :)
> > >>
> > >> Not necessarily; I think it's only an issue if one calls one's
> > >> debating opponent a Nazi or something.  Since I haven't done that,
> > >> it doesn't apply. :-)
> > >
> > >No...Godwin specified that one person had to refer to the other AS Hitler.
> > >
> > >merely refering *to* Hitler, let alone Nazis, doesn't cut it.
> > >
> > >You have to *accuse* your opponent of BEING Hitler.
> > >
> > >Beside ****FUCK*** *GODWIN*
> > >
> > >Hope that helps.
> >
> > Don't get so excited; it'll ruin your blood pressure.  :-)
> 
> My blood pressure is fine.
> 
> When I was in Saudi Arabia, the battalion surgeon was giving everyone
> de-mobilization physicals.  Now...since I had been made the acting
> Night Operations NCO, sat around for 6 months on my rear end eating
> M&M's.   Based on my blood pressure and pulse data (post-stress), he
> thought I was a long-distance runner.
> 
> On my most recent physical, (about a year ago), the number had barely
> changed.
> 
> >
> > [rest snipped]
> >
> > --
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- insert random free advice here
> > EAC code #191       8d:02h:47m actually running Linux.
> >                     I was asleep at the switch the rest of the time.
> 
> --
> Aaron R. Kulkis
> Unix Systems Engineer
> DNRC Minister of all I survey
> ICQ # 3056642
> 
> L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
>    can defeat the email search bots.  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>    [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> K: Truth in advertising:
>         Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
>         Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
>         Special Interest Sierra Club,
>         Anarchist Members of the ACLU
>         Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
>         The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
>         Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
> 
> J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
>    The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
>    also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
> 
> I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
>    challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
>    between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
>    Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
> 
> H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
>     premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
>     you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
>     you are lazy, stupid people"
> 
> G:  Knackos...you're a retard.
> 
> F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
>    adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
> 
> E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
>    her behavior improves.
> 
> D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
>    ...despite (C) above.
> 
> C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
> 
> B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
>    method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
>    direction that she doesn't like.
> 
> A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

Well, Aaron, you have the watch now.  I have to do some dirty work
Monday... Fire a dumb Doctor.  I won't have much time any more with any
news groups... maybe I can get back in but I have some grave doubts. 
You're ok.  I think a lot of people mis-understand you.
Keep advocating UNIX and Linux.

------------------------------

From: "Alex Chaihorsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: 15 Apr 2001 07:42:42 GMT
Reply-To: "Alex Chaihorsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


"Walter Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:32:28 -0500, Scott Erb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>If any
> >kind of socialism is ever to be achieved, it will have to be democratic
> >and chosen, not enforced.  I suspect that is still generations away.
>

Thanks G-d.

Alex Chaihorsky
Reno, NV



------------------------------

From: Gunner© <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 00:35:58 -0700

"Alex Chaihorsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>"Rob Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>> >
>> > Rob Robertson wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Gunner © wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:47:32 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > <snip>
>> > >
>> > > > >Let's take a nice, Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon style pure-democratic
>vote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >All for putting Glen "Sliverdick" Yeadon up against the wall, and
>> > > > >filling him full of lead, say "AYE!"  All opposed, say "NAY"
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >Let's see how much Sliverdick likes democracy now.
>> > > >
>> > > > AYE!  And I'll donate the ammo!
>> > >
>> > >  Well, that's pretty silly, especially when we can use Glen's
>> > > own tax money to pay for the ammo and the firing squad.
>> > >
>> > >  Thank God we live in a country founded on the principle of
>> > > inalienable, individual rights, eh?
>> >
>> > So far, we have two AYEs and zero NAYs.
>>
>>  It's a qualified 'aye', of course. I wouldn't really want to vote on
>> such a thing because there are no moral grounds for doing so, but as
>> an online exercise in illustrating the inherent flaw in pure democracy,
>> I'm all for it.
>>
>> _
>> RR
>
>You are all blood-thirsty bastards. He is mine - he threatened to kick my
>ass (in my HOW HITLER... thread) and I promised to buy him a ticket if he
>will ever feel the courage to try.
>Human life is too valuable. My main concern - how to prevent him from
>spreading his genes.
>
>Alex Chaihorsky
>Reno, NV

Thats simple..to paraphrase that Great Speaker for the Liberal
Establishment.. Aleck Baldwin:

We go to his house and drag him from his home and castrate him, then
we sterilize his wife and kids....with broken beer bottles

Gunner

=========================================================

 "A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an
 invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write
 a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort
 the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone,
 solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program
 a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die
 gallantly. Specialization is for insects." Robert Heinlein

------------------------------

From: Gunner© <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this , day.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 00:36:02 -0700

Mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> > 
>> 
>> I'll take that as a complement, even if it is from a pimply-faced,
>> cowardly weakling such as yourself.
>
>I am sure i could kick your perdue chicken farm ass any day.
>
I get first dips on the ticket sales, the residuals and the Tshirt
concession!! YE HAAAAAA!

I really want to see this. Now the question is.. First blood? First
broken bone? First permanently crippling injury or does Aaron have to
kill you to win?  My money is on him..in any event.

Gunner

=========================================================

 "A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an
 invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write
 a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort
 the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone,
 solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program
 a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die
 gallantly. Specialization is for insects." Robert Heinlein

------------------------------

From: "Tom Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: To Eric FunkenBush
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 07:49:55 GMT


"Erik Funkenbusch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:6O9C6.3234$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

<snip>

> > >
> > > Why do you bitch about MS?  *NOBODY* has released a fully conformant
> > > compiler yet.
> > >
> > > VC7 will conform in almost all ways except Partial Template
> Specialization
> > > and the export keyword.
> >
> > Which makes it almost useless in a general production environment.
>
> For some, but as of today, very few people even use the STL, much less
their
> own templates.

Unfortunately, I do....
If the aforementioned lack of support is true (I've not had the time to even
read up on 7),  I'll have to give it a miss.
Why would they not support so powerful and elegant a feature?

--
Tom Wilson





------------------------------

From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 03:50:23 -0400

billh wrote:
> 
> "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> 
> > That's the problem with us.military.army.  Most of you are more interested
> > in sadistic attacks and knee-jerk contradiction than anything else.
> 
> Unlike the simple task of pointing out your "war-hero" lies and idiocy,
> wannabe.

So says the man who doesn't do ANYTHING other than argue pointlessly
with his fellow soldiers...oops....Bill's not a soldier...as he has,
on so many occasions...pointed out that he doesn't wear a uniform.



-- 
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642

L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
   can defeat the email search bots.  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

K: Truth in advertising:
        Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
        Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
        Special Interest Sierra Club,
        Anarchist Members of the ACLU
        Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
        The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
        Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,


J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
   The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
   also known as old hags who've hit the wall....

I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

G:  Knackos...you're a retard.


F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.

E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
   her behavior improves.

D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (C) above.
 
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.

B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
   method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
   direction that she doesn't like.

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************

Reply via email to