Linux-Advocacy Digest #873, Volume #33 Tue, 24 Apr 01 11:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: Pete Goodwin is in good company (Pete Goodwin)
Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1 (Pete Goodwin)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Why left-wing communist assholes hate Reagan. (was Re:
Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.) (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1 ("Edward Rosten")
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Re: Intel versus Sparc
Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft! ("JS PL")
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males ("MH")
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (chrisv)
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (chrisv)
Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor (James Kanze)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Chad Everett)
Re: Could Linux be used in this factory environment ? (Jonadab the Unsightly One)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (Chad Everett)
Re: Communism ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1 (Donn Miller)
Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1 ("Tom Wilson")
Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1 ("Tom Wilson")
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Chad Everett)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Chad Everett)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (Roberto Alsina)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Pete Goodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pete Goodwin is in good company
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:19:18 +0100
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Considering that setting up network cards with YAST is rediculously
> simple...
Unless one is DHCP...
> I guess that means that editing the config files is MUCH easier than
> you claim....isn't it, hypcrite.
No it isn't. I found it easier to _leave it alone_ rather than change it
again.
--
---
Pete Goodwin
All your no fly zone are belong to us
My opinions are my own
------------------------------
From: Pete Goodwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:16:46 +0100
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Another red herring.
Another _fact_.
> in /etc/profile, put in the following code:
Fine, why doesn't Mandrake do this? Do any distros do this?
--
---
Pete Goodwin
All your no fly zone are belong to us
My opinions are my own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 24 Apr 2001 13:27:45 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:17:35 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>
>> billh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >"Roberto Alsina"
>> >
>> >> "killing at war is not murder because it's not unlawful".
>> >>
>> >> Now, whether you can see what you said or not, is not my problem.
>> >>
>> >> >The two are not the same.
>> >>
>> >> No, not the same, but one implies the other. And you said enough
>> >> to imply what I said you said.
>> >
>> >And the point remains. You are wrong to say killing in war is wrong.
>>
>> I see proof by blatant assertion is still considered logic by some.
>
>Axioms do not need proof, moron.
And axioms should only be introduced with the utmost care.
Perhaps, since this is an axiom, you would like to formally
present the axiomatic system from which it comes?
So, you take as an evident truth that killing in war is right.
Well, all I can say is that your axiomatic system sucks, and
I will just go with not-Kulkian moral geometry.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Subject: Re: Why left-wing communist assholes hate Reagan. (was Re:
Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.)
Date: 24 Apr 2001 13:28:54 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:30:12 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:49:05 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 07:26:48 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>> >> > Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Are you aware that, according to feminist doctrine, ***ALL*** sex
>> >> >> > between men and women (including consensual sex between a husband
>> >> >> > and wife) is rape.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Nonsense. It's true that there are feminists this extreme, but it's
>> >> >> certainly not true that all feminists are like that. That's sort of
>> >> >
>> >> > That's their official doctrine now.
>> >>
>> >> More nonsense. To presume that there is one "official doctrine" called
>> >> feminism is as silly as to suggest that there is one called conservatism.
>> >
>> >I define "official feminist doctrine" as what kind of laws they try to
>> >get enacted.
>>
>> Who's they? And if you answer "the feminists", I'm gonna puke all over
>> you.
>
>Andrea Dworkin
>Catherine McKinnon
>Patricia Ireland
>etc.
Cool. Now you should realize these are not all the women that
consider themselves "feminists", do you?
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: "Edward Rosten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 16:42:56 +0100
>> in /etc/profile, put in the following code:
>
> Fine, why doesn't Mandrake do this? Do any distros do this?
Because every system has different requirements. The distributor is not
telepathic.
-Ed
--
You can't go wrong with psycho-rats.
u 9 8 e j r (at) e c s . o x . a c . u k
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:55:16 GMT
>>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
Aaron> Brent R wrote:
>> > Modern feminism decries "the patriarchy", and then whines for
>> > it to come back and clean up her diapers, because she still hasn't
>> > learned to shit in the toilet.
>> Jesus man, do you really have to be that crude?
>> Be careful Aaron, not all women are like that, I wouldn't even say the
Aaron> I wasn't referring to "all women" is was referring to that body
Aaron> known as "feminism"
No, you are talking about a tiny minority of those women who
self-identify as feminist. For most women that means that women
have equal rights as men. Not the lunatic fringe that declare
all heterosexual sex is rape.
>> majority. There is a tiny minority of shrill man-haters who make the
>> rest look bad.
--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Intel versus Sparc
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:03:48 GMT
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:13:51 -0400, mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:09:19 -0400, mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...
>> >the stack to the point where it either corrupts the heap or crosses a protected
>> >boundary. Remember programming 101 where you saw of the stack grows down and
>> >the heap grows up?
>>
>> Impossible with a properly set up MMU. The stack and heaps are not
>> contiguous.
>
>Not true, that depends on layout.
>
>On the x86, process space is 32 bit, usually this space is divided in two,
>upper 2G goes to system, lower 2G goes to process. Lately, however, lower 3G
>has been mapped to user and upper 1G mapped to system.
>
The entire 2GB isn't mapped. Unless you've got a swapfile that big, it is
impossible for the stack to run into the heap.
------------------------------
From: "JS PL" <hi everybody!>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: Justice Department LOVES Microsoft!
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:18:38 -0400
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> JS PL wrote:
> >
> > "Matthew Gardiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > JS PL wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > >
> > > > > > And your a College Educated Unix Engineer.....who only uses
> > > > Windows..Pffft..
> > > > >
> > > > > Even after I explain the deception, he still doesn't get it.
> > > >
> > > > Explaining something which is possible isn't proof that your doing
it.
> > Your
> > > > using Windows98 and lying about it. Your worse than Devlin who uses
it
> > and
> > > > claims he's forced to do it.
> > > >
> > > > > > After you deal with your own lies, you can begin throwing
> > accusations
> > > > > > around.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, what college campus did you trespass upon?
> > > >
> > > > SDSU - dropped out after a year, and have never looked back.
> > >
> > > LOL. me, a 4 year degree vs. JS PL, a college drop out!
> > >
> > > Matthew Gardiner
> >
> > I did have a paragraph written in response to your 4 year degree
bragging
> > but have decided against posting it. But believe it or not the easiest
money
> > is found in places where 4 year degrees mean nothing.
>
> AS a fellow college drop-out (financial reasons), I must say
> that you, JS PL, are an uneducate moron, and Mr. Gardiner's
> use of logic, facts, and fundamental computing principles
> indicates that he is a highly qualified authority.
Uneducated, perhaps, I quit for financial reasons myself. I was busy making
80k a year racing standarbred horses around the US. We would get a good
laugh at the supposed "highly educated" lot that couldn't handle the
business for more than a year, and nearly always left BROKE.
------------------------------
From: "MH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:25:29 GMT
> > Pay is not the issue. I've no problem with women getting equal pay.
> > The point I was making, my opinion obviously, is that a man is a
> > "flagellating idiot" if he were to marry a feminist.
> > Get it now?
> A woman who thinks she should get paid the same as a man for the same work
> is a feminist. Get it now?
Anyone who simply feels that gender should not affect pay scale does not a
true feminist or feminist supporter make. That's like saying someone is a
left wing extremist because they support liberal environmental policies.
When if fact, every other view they share could very well be considered
conservative.
Most self proclaimed feminists that I've crossed paths with have accepted
that label based on more than just equal pay for equal work. I'm don't wish
to imply that I'm not sympathetic to some of their other needs \ demands \
gripes, just that I've no time for zealots and fanatics with chips on their
shoulders so large as to make meaningful dialog impossible. Not to mention,
that if I want my balls busted I'll use a hammer. (-:
------------------------------
From: chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.singles
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:26:03 GMT
"Edward Rosten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey nimwit! We had a poster trying to lecture us that homosexuals want
>> to just "live their own private lives". But that isn't true is it.
>
>Yes it is. Homosexuals are normal people. Normal people generally want to
>live quiet lives. In general, homosexuals want to live quiet lives like
>everyone else on the planet (in general).
Can you think your way out of a wet paper bag? In one post, you say
that you can't generalize because "not all" have a political agenda,
and the next post *you yourself* generalize when you say that they
want to live quiet lives!
------------------------------
From: chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:29:31 GMT
Chronos Tachyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Y'know, it never ceases to amaze me the degree to which some people seem to
>believe that gay people are trying to recruit others. Do they think, given
>the choice, I would PREFER to be a part of one of the most widely disliked
>minorities in today's society, much less drag more people into it?
Please explain how these concepts are related. They are not. Just
because you didn't prefer to be the way you are, doesn't mean that you
wouldn't prefer attractive males to have similar feelings as you do!
------------------------------
From: James Kanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.shareware.programmer,comp.editors,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.java.softwaretools,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 16:27:36 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johan Kullstam wrote:
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Syntax highlighting is useful for NOVICE programmers.
> > Most experienced programmers have used one-color text for program
> > code for years...
> for me, 1 color is simply not enough. i want 2 colors -- one for
> foreground and another for background.
At least:-). While I don't like having a different color for
everything under the sun (especially as the simplified parsers used in
the editors often get it wrong anyway), I've found it useful to use
colors (or fonts) to distinguish :
keywords: if I mistype one, I notice immediately, because it
doesn't change color when I hit the blank after it.
comments: especially using block comments, as required by javadoc.
(Even in C, I *always* closed my comments at the end of each
line.)
strings and character literals: especially useful in the cases where
the strings contain data that could be interpreted as code.
The other "modern" features I like are parentheses matching (already
present in the original vi) and automatic indenting (which signals
immediately when I've got a parentheses too many or too few.
--
James Kanze mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Conseils en informatique orientée objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
Ziegelhüttenweg 17a, 60598 Frankfurt, Germany Tel. +49(069)63198627
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Everett)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24 Apr 2001 09:09:02 -0500
On 24 Apr 2001 12:45:44 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 23 Apr 2001 19:53:55 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:42:42 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:24:38 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:03:29 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:49:05 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>>>>> >> >> >taking random, unrelated snippets out of context is not victory.
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> It is fun. Fun is a small victory.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >So, Roberto, have you stopped raping your daughter?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Fallacy of false dichotomy.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Bzzzzzt! wrong.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >If it's a false dichotomy, then surely you can tell us what the dichotomy is....
>>>>>
>>>>> Bzzzt. Not everything is a dichotomy.
>>>>> In this case, in particular, you are presenting something that is NOT
>>>>> a dichotomy as if it were one. That's why it's a FALSE dichotomy.
>>>>
>>>>Then tell us what is the dichotomy which I supposedly presented?
>>>
>>>"Have you stopped raping your daughteri?" is a dichotomy.
>>>
>>>>> Don't they teach logic in Perdue?
>>>>>
>>>>> >> And a way too worn-out clichè.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Perhaps you need to learn new tactics, Aaron. This one is stale.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >the words "false premise" means nothing to you, does they?
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, considering I was using no false premise in the statement
>>>>> you replied to, it means "non sequitur" right now.
>>>>>
>>>>> It also means "one of the ways in which your tactic is flawed".
>>>>
>>>>Clue for the really really really fucking clueless: I give Roberto the
>>>>Answer to the first part of the post, and he STILL fucking misses it.
>>>
>>>You expect me to say that "false premise" is the right answer to your
>>>question? Actually, that depends on whether I raped my daughter or
>>>not. Since you don't know one way or the other, you were not using
>>>a false premise, but an umproved assumption (different things).
>>
>>I thought you didn't have a daughter?
>
>But did Aaron KNOW that when he wrote that? Believing is not
>knowledge, regardless of what god tells you.
I thought you had an English dictionary? Try using it.
Man, Roberto teaching logic IS malpractice.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonadab the Unsightly One)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Could Linux be used in this factory environment ?
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:34:08 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hartmann Schaffer) wrote:
> all the reasons you give describe a thin client arrangement,
A one-computer-many-terminals arrangment fits even better.
The terminals can be VT100s or whatever. Win3.1 boxes?
Shoot, you could use 8088s (e.g., the original IBM PC
from 1980), but that would be overkill.
> You're ignoring the one about management. Consider that
> many factories operate 24/7, which means they never shut
> down the terminals and the "application" runs constantly.
> When you upgrade the application, the terminals are still
> running it. You have to get all the clients to shutdown
> and load the new version.
That's silly. All you need is to queue the upgrade to
any given page until nobody's looking at it. Or if you
need to upgrade the software they're using to view the
pages, install the new version, set it up so that when
a terminal is reset it uses the new version, and leave
the old version in place for a few weeks until every
terminal has been reset. You want something that can
be up 24/7? Base it on OpenVMS or on Unix, and get
an online uninterruptible power supply for the
computer; hook that up to an emergency generator, and
you can go years without downtime. Your terminals will
go down when there's a power outage, so you also need
generator hookup for the vital ones. With UPS, you
wouldn't need the generator unless the power goes out
for more than a few minutes, but better safe than sorry;
get a generator. The terminals don't need to be on UPS
because if the power supply is interrupted for two
seconds while the generator kicks in, the user will
barely notice. But you don't want the computer's power
supply to be out for that long, so it needs the
online UPS for totally uninterrupted operation.
Above all, you don't want the computer stopping for
no reason, so run it on Unix or VMS, and you won't
go down unless there's a hardware problem or some
idiot runs a forkbomb.
- jonadab
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Everett)
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24 Apr 2001 09:12:53 -0500
On 24 Apr 2001 12:58:57 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>You said women are better off when they are not allowed to walk in
>the street without male company.
>
>That's pretty hateful.
>
Prehaps as hateful as people like you who would like to see women
walk along in the street with no pratical way to protect themselves.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 07:41:11 -0700
theRadical wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:12:14 -0700, Gunner © <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:31:15 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>> >
> >>> >ANYBODY who seeks to enslave others sacrifices any claim to his own life.
> >>> >
> >>> >Hope that helps.
> >>>
> >>> which means soooo [sic] much coming from a fucking idiot twat such as
> >>> yourself.
> >>
> >>Gonna come say that to my face?
> >
> >WEEEEE! I get dibs on the video rights! And we can split the fee when
> >we send numbnuts body to a medical school.
> >
> >Aaron... try to draw it out as long as possible, so we can see lots of
> >his blood and hear the sounds of breaking bones.. Ive already got a
> >buyer for the master tape.
> >
> >Gunner
>
> why doesn't it surprise me that a sick gun nut fuck like gunner would
> think such trash?
Because he's got a good sense of humor. :-)
Sue
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:44:38 -0400
From: Donn Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1
Pete Goodwin wrote:
>
> In article <9c0t6h$1nb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
> > Don't blame Linux for your shortcomings as an administrator. If you were
> > competent, you'd have a precess limit, snd so the machine would not be
> > effectively taken out by that.
>
> It's the default on Mandrake.
It's the default on most unix systems, I'd imagine. Anytime I use
RealPlayer or MediaPlayer on Windows ME, it brings the entire system to
a screeching halt (except for the Media Player or Real Player). With
unix, I can run Real Player and actually do other
computationally-intensive tasks. Imagine that.
One doesn't have to try too hard to make Windows unresponsive to other
tasks. Plus, one other bad thing about Windows is that a lot of apps
"silently" crash without you noticing it, which takes chunks out of the
overall system reliability. You don't notice it until you do something
very minor, which REALLY hoses your system. At least with Linux, the
entire OS crashes at once. With Windows, little bricks are taken out of
the structure one at a time with each minor little "silent crash", and
then, when you're least expecting it, one minor little app topples the
entire structure. With Linux, it's either the big mushroom cloud, or
your system keeps running reliably. I'd rather have the entire system
crash at once than having gradual kernel breakdowns occurring behind my
back, which then blows up in my face when I least expect it.
No software is perfect, but Windows is right there at the bottom of the
heap.
====== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ======
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
======= Over 80,000 Newsgroups = 16 Different Servers! ======
------------------------------
From: "Tom Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:49:17 GMT
"Pete Goodwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
> > > If Linux is so great, why can I take it out with:
> > >
> > > while (true) fork();
> >
> > You can't with properly imposed resource limits. This isn't too hard to
> > do.
>
> No limit is the default for some distros.
Their assumption, admittedly wrong in some cases, being that the intended
audience knows best what limits they need to impose.
------------------------------
From: "Tom Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why do Win advocates suck? Part 1
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:50:25 GMT
"Pete Goodwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <9c0t6h$1nb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
> > Don't blame Linux for your shortcomings as an administrator. If you were
> > competent, you'd have a precess limit, snd so the machine would not be
> > effectively taken out by that.
>
> It's the default on Mandrake.
I'll admit, that's pretty silly considering their target audience is the
home desktop user. (I noticed the same thing, myself)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Everett)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24 Apr 2001 09:28:34 -0500
On 24 Apr 2001 12:37:55 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:43:43 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>>
>>> Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >On 23 Apr 2001 19:31:57 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>Bzzzt. Not everything is a dichotomy.
>>> >>In this case, in particular, you are presenting something that is NOT
>>> >>a dichotomy as if it were one. That's why it's a FALSE dichotomy.
>>> >>
>>> >>Don't they teach logic in Perdue?
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Oh brother! Roberto lecturing on logic.
>>>
>>> I actually did precisely that a couple of times. With lanctern and all.
>>
>>Talk about malpractice.
>
>Wanna discuss Gödel's theorem's proof? Start by proposing an alternate
>paradox for the setup.
>
>Roberto Alsina
This sentence is false.
Gee, we can do web searches too. Proof that Roberto teaching logic
is malpractive can be found within the USENET archives.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Everett)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24 Apr 2001 09:30:34 -0500
On 24 Apr 2001 12:52:38 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Quick: what's the difference between a Felapton and a Darii?
>
>Roberto Alsina
Yawn. Roberto can do web searches on topics of Logic.
They are different figures of Aristotelian syllogisms.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: 24 Apr 2001 14:54:50 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24 Apr 2001 12:45:44 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>But did Aaron KNOW that when he wrote that? Believing is not
>>knowledge, regardless of what god tells you.
>
>I thought you had an English dictionary?
Actually, I don't. But then there's the internet.
> Try using it.
What, you have a dictionary that says believing is knowing?
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: 24 Apr 2001 14:57:22 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24 Apr 2001 12:37:55 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:43:43 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >On 23 Apr 2001 19:31:57 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Bzzzt. Not everything is a dichotomy.
>>>> >>In this case, in particular, you are presenting something that is NOT
>>>> >>a dichotomy as if it were one. That's why it's a FALSE dichotomy.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Don't they teach logic in Perdue?
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >Oh brother! Roberto lecturing on logic.
>>>>
>>>> I actually did precisely that a couple of times. With lanctern and all.
>>>
>>>Talk about malpractice.
>>
>>Wanna discuss Gödel's theorem's proof? Start by proposing an alternate
-----T---
Chad, read here:----------------------------------------------------+
>>paradox for the setup.
>>
>>Roberto Alsina
>
>This sentence is false.
Follow the instructions above, then try again.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: 24 Apr 2001 14:59:48 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 24 Apr 2001 12:58:57 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>You said women are better off when they are not allowed to walk in
>>the street without male company.
>>
>>That's pretty hateful.
>
>Prehaps as hateful as people like you who would like to see women
>walk along in the street with no pratical way to protect themselves.
I want women to be able to walk alone if they want to. It seems that
you only want freedom for yourself. Or you want to be forbidden from
walking alone, too? A gang could harm you.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
