Linux-Advocacy Digest #939, Volume #33 Thu, 26 Apr 01 11:13:03 EDT
Contents:
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Communism (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Communism (theRadical)
Re: Communism (theRadical)
Re: Communism (theRadical)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (theRadical)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: 26 Apr 2001 14:16:18 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:10:35 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:44:27 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:42:35 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 02:24:23 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> billh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >"Roberto Alsina"
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> After immigrating I could become a citizen. Yet you said I "will
>> >> >> >> >> never become a juror". That is not something you can possibly know,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Tell us all when you do become a juror within any jurisdiction in the USA.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Let me guess... I immigrate, I naturalize, then I get called, eventually,
>> >> >> >> and not disqualify myself, then I am not disqualified during jury
>selection.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >how much did you bribe the INS people to naturalizes you, you ignorant twit.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Who told you I naturalized?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >So, you admit that you have never passed the naturalization test,
>> >> >which requires you to demonstrate that you understand the Constition
>> >> >(which includes the 2nd Amendment)
>> >>
>> >> What's a constition? Anyway, I am not bound by your constitution,
>> >> knowing it is not important.
>> >
>> >You claim to be in the United States.
>>
>> Quotes please. I am not, and have not been, in several years, in the US.
>> In fact, I am pretty far from the US.
>>
>> >As long as you are on US soil, thne you are legally bound by it.
>>
>> Unless I am a diplomat.
>
>Yes, you are. Diplomats have been tried and imprisoned in the United States.
>Diplomatic immunity applies ONLY if the diplomat's government asserts it.
Well, that doesn't means it doesn't apply. It only means it can be waived.
>If, for example, a diplomat walked out infront of his embassy, and started
>shooting protesters, I can guarantee that he would, at the very least,
>rot in prison for the rest of his natural life.
It depends.
>> >Hope that helps.
>>
>> It helps seing you have some strange thoughts in your mind that I
>> have no clue where they came from.
>>
>> >> I have not passed the naturalization test because I have no need
>> >
>> >No surprise there.
>>
>> Indeed.
>
>So, you admit that your understanding of the philosophical foundation
>of the US constitution, and the liberties it guarantees, is sufficiently
>less than your endorsement of the oppressive "government is always right,
>the poeple cannot be trusted" police state from which you came.
You say "from which you came". Where do you think I came to, Aaron?
Anyway, I can't parse that paragraph. I tried hard, yet can not get any
meaning out of it.
>My suggestion, Roberto, is that if you don't appreciate living
>in a free society, that you go back to the fascist hole you
>crawled out of.
Aaron, perhaps you can not read. Where do you think I came from,
and where do you think I am?
>> >> for it, Aaron, I am a citizen of where I live.
>> >
>> >And from what you have said so far, you couldn't pass the
>> >test if you tried
>>
>> Oh, I can lie in tests adeptly.
>
>So, you admit that you are untrustworthy.
No, I admit I am capable of lying. As you are. Only I am way better.
The capability is not the act.
>> >You're still bound by the US Constitution as long as you are within
>> >the borders of the United States.
>>
>> Really? Gee, maybe I knew that already when I said I am not
>> bound by the US constitution.
>
>Try murdering someone in broad daylight and see what happens,
>you fascist pig.
I would go to jail. But not because I was bound by the US constitution.
--
Roberto Alsina (Amused by Aaron's inability to read)
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
soc.men,alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:16:41 -0400
theRadical wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:59:32 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >"You've got MALE.. sex organs!" wrote:
> >>
> >> Geez, Aaron, it DOESN'T HELP.
> >>
> >> STILL sounds like you are coming from a right wing dufus
> >
> >Translation: anybody who isn't a rabid marxist
>
> don't you love how anyone who doesn't agree with kulkis is a marxist?
No, only those who advocate marxist policies are marxist.
The fact that you think such positions are normal is part of your problem.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: 26 Apr 2001 14:17:50 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:13:56 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:57:36 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> and lying is for dolts like yourself.
>> >
>> >Speak for yourself, dolt.
>>
>> Are you saying you have not lied here, Aaron?
>>
>> Didn't you, when I said marrying you could be dangerous for a woman's
>> health say that was not true, only to say, two posts later, that
>> you would kill such woman if she ever got alimony from you?
>
>Divorcing =/= marrying
If she didn't marry, she can not divorce. Getting alimony from you
would be a direct consequence of her marriage.
>Hope that helps, Master of non-Logic.
Gee, why I am not impressed?
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (theRadical)
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:17:00 GMT
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:59:08 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>theRadical wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:40:03 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >theRadical wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:13:25 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 03:48:20 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 18:43:17 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 03:10:20 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:27:59 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:26:20 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:49:32 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:31:15 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >theRadical wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:06:25 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >the Democratic Party is a bunch of Marxists, who,
>knowing that using
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >the name Communists would be bad PR, engage in a
>campaign of deception
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >to get the populace of the country to vote for their
>own enslavement.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >ANYBODY who seeks to enslave others sacrifices any
>claim to his own life.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Hope that helps.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> which means soooo [sic] much coming from a fucking idiot
>twat such as
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> yourself.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Gonna come say that to my face?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> i'm still waiting for you to show up to repossess my
>vehicle and
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> explain your ridiculous theory that a ship captain is
>nothing more
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> that a paper pusher.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Spot the strawman arguments.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> strawman? you threatened to confiscate my car as part of you
>duties
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> as a law enforcement officer.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Wrong on two counts.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >I said, by your logic, I should, as a government agent, be able
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >to confiscate your car
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrong, you said you WERE a government agent
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Yes, I am.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> well then, show up and confiscate my vehicle asshole.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >That wouldn't be fun...you'd be expecting me.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >Nah, it's much more fun to snatch it when you least expect it,
>> >> >> >> >> >and have made absolutely no provisions for alternative methods.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >You know...those alternative methods that you insist EVERYBODY ELSE
>> >> >> >> >> >should be using.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> you are nothing but a chicken shit usenet bully. why don't you quit
>> >> >> >> >> spewing your crap and shut the fuck up.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >So, in other words, when TheRaDICKal wants the government to steal
>> >> >> >> >everybody's self-defence tools, that's ok,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> i NEVER have advocated confiscation of weapons dick head.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >..but that's what you dream about every night, isn't it, fascist prick.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> not at all asshole. however, thanks for admitting that you lied about
>> >> >> me wanting to "steal everybody's self-defense tools." you make it
>> >> >> very easy to prove you are nothing but a lying sack of shit.
>> >> >
>> >> >You claimed that anyone who can't "prove" to your satisfaction that they
>> >> >need a weapon should have it confiscated.
>> >>
>> >> i never said such a thing. you are lying. your conjecture is not
>> >> fact. otherwise, post the quote
>> >> right here --------->
>> >
>> >
>> >No need. Your reputations preceeds you.
>>
>> another kulkis lie proved.
>
>If it's proven, then it's not a lie.
>Hope that helps, moron.
let me rephrase for you shithead. it has been proven that you lied
again.
>
>> you are an idiot kulkis.
>
>Please write another 10,000 posts devoted to the subject of why
>you *think* I'm an idiot.
>
>It will amuse me.
no need, you continue to prove it over and over, liar.
>
>
>> why don't you just give up you fucking liar.
>
>I Annoy the fuck out of you, don't I, you fascist pig.
ouch, that hurts, another lie from a liar.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (theRadical)
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:18:03 GMT
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:59:36 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>theRadical wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:53:58 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >Duh-Ridiculed one wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 18:03:49 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Gunner ©" wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> > >> >> >WEEEEE! I get dibs on the video rights! And we can split the fee
>when
>> >> >> > >> >> >we send numbnuts body to a medical school.
>> >> >> > >> >> >
>> >> >> > >> >> >Aaron... try to draw it out as long as possible, so we can see lots
>of
>> >> >> > >> >> >his blood and hear the sounds of breaking bones.. Ive already got a
>> >> >> > >> >> >buyer for the master tape.
>> >> >> > >> >> >
>> >> >> > >> >> >Gunner
>> >> >> > >> >>
>> >> >> > >> >> why doesn't it surprise me that a sick gun nut fuck like gunner would
>> >> >> > >> >> think such trash?
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >Because he's got a good sense of humor. :-)
>> >> >> > >> >
>> >> >> > >> >Sue
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> Thanks Sue!
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> And of course..I have a good business sense as well. I could indeed
>> >> >> > >> sell a video of Aaron giving the Radical a serious attitude adjustment.
>> >> >> > >> ..Afterall.. wouldnt Libertarian/Conservitive, with more than 6 weeks
>> >> >> > >> on the net.. love to see a troll who's limited vocabulary includes
>> >> >> > >> "sick gun nut fuck" , get his shit scattered? Then there are the
>> >> >> > >> T-shirt rights...and the bumper sticker, beer and popcorn
>> >> >> > >> residuals..hence the request to draw it out as long as possible.
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> T-shirt example:
>> >> >> > >> Front Side..
>> >> >> > >> "This is a troll." (picture of a gnormlish nerd like Radical in front of
>> >> >> > >> a computer)
>> >> >> > >> Backside..
>> >> >> > >> " This is a troll after Aaron" (picture of a roadkill with a sandaled
>> >> >> > >> foot and clawed, broken fingered hand, sticking out of the puddle)
>> >> >> > >>
>> >> >> > >> Picture the Budwieser frogs... "grease" "a" "troll"
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >Could you post a price list please. <G> Any discounts available?
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > >Sue
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Ma'am..for you , Ill make sure you get a good selection of every thing
>> >> >> > for free.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Everything?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But...sue's a married woman.
>> >> >
>> >> >I am? You mean that paperwork I got from the court in 1987 was fake?
>> >> >Geeze, I hope this doesn't get out because I sure don't want The Asshole
>> >> >showing up at my door demanding his marital "rights". eeewwww. If I am
>> >> >still married, as you say, I must say that these last 14 years have been
>> >> >the best part of it. <G>
>> >> >
>> >> >Sue (who is "taken" but not married)
>> >>
>> >> just more proof that "kulkis the shit head" has absolutely no idea of
>> >> what he speaks.
>> >
>> >Humor isn't your strong suit, is it, Duh-Ridicule....
>>
>> there is nothing funny about a pathetic little lying asshole such as
>> yourself kulkis.
>
>Shut up, you little fascist bastard.
showing your true third grade mentality now aren't you liar?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (theRadical)
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:19:33 GMT
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:00:03 GMT, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>
> Aaron> theRadical wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:13:25 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> i NEVER have advocated confiscation of weapons dick head.
>
> >> >> >..but that's what you dream about every night, isn't it, fascist prick.
>
> >> >> not at all asshole. however, thanks for admitting that you lied about
> >> >> me wanting to "steal everybody's self-defense tools." you make it
> >> >> very easy to prove you are nothing but a lying sack of shit.
>
> >> >You claimed that anyone who can't "prove" to your satisfaction that they
> >> >need a weapon should have it confiscated.
>
> >> i never said such a thing. you are lying. your conjecture is not
> >> fact. otherwise, post the quote
> >> right here --------->
>
>
> Aaron> No need. Your reputations preceeds you.
>
>Gee, what a surprise, Mr. Kulkis fails to back his words
>(for the record, I have no idea if he was correct here,
>I am just pointing out an example of his consistent failure
>to back up his statements).
i expect nothing more from kulkis the slimy little troll. he tries to
intimidate and lie to win with his convoluted arguments. what a fool
he is.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (theRadical)
Crossposted-To:
soc.men,alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.society.liberalism
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:21:20 GMT
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:15:45 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>theRadical wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:10:10 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >Chad Everett wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:28:52 GMT, Scott Erb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Chad Everett wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:22:58 -0400, Scott D. Erb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Lynette Warren wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>what a scam American feminism truly is
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >How do you define feminism? In feminist theory they are many kinds. A
>> >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What the heck is "feminist theory"?
>> >> >
>> >> >Did you read beyond that point? I explained a bit about it.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Yes I did. What I gathered is that "feminist theory" is very much like
>> >> "bigotry theory".
>> >
>> >
>> >Feminism is a system for oppressing the average men.
>> >
>> >Males in *elite* positions in our society support it, because they'll
>> >use any excuse to oppress other men.
>> >
>> >
>> >Hope that helps.
>>
>> more ignorant ramblings of a proven liar.
>
>Tell us again about how you think everyone need to "prove" their
>need for a gun before owning one.
first, prove where i ever said such a think liar.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:22:12 -0400
Roberto Alsina wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:03:18 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:37:22 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:04:51 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:34:44 GMT, chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina) wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>>It can be dangrous for women to walk alone.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>So, women should be forbidden from doing anything that's dangerous?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >What a jerk. Are you just a troll now? We know you're not that
> >> >> >> >stupid...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> In the part you snipped, I introduced the stuff about women and walking
> >> >> >> alone by saying "Aaron believes women are better off when they are NOT
> >> >> >> ALLOWED to walk alone".
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >No reasonable person can leap from "women should have the CHOICE of
> >> >> >> >carrying a gun for personal protection" to "women should be forbidden
> >> >> >> >from doing anything that's dangerous".
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Actually, it goes exactly the other way around. Aaron is pro forbidding
> >> >> >> women the right to walk alone, because they would be in danger.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I never ADVOCATED such a thing.
> >> >>
> >> >> You said women are better off in Saudi Arabia, where they are forbidden
> >> >> from leaving the house unaccompanied.
> >> >
> >> >From a quality of life standpoint, they are MUCH better off.
> >> >
> >> >I did not say that it was better in every single respect, I said
> >> >that AS A WHOLE, they have a better life.
> >>
> >> Well, the incredible oppression and lack of freedom apparently
> >> are unimportant to you.
> >> Perhaps you would be better off in prison. You can't go out,
> >> unless you are escorted, but you get three meals a day, and
> >> you meet people.
> >
> >Thank you for admitting that sacrificing one's freedom is the greatest loss.
>
> Well, thank you for accepting that you have two faces.
Awwwwwwww, did you get sucked in by my little ploy?
Poooooooooor poor baby.
> You feel sacrificing freedom is the greatest loss if it's your freedom,
> yet you say Arabian women are better off sacrificing theirs.
No, I believe no such thing. But it was fun to get you to admit
that there is NO justification for sacrificing freedom one's freedom.
>
> It's kinda like when you advocate killing those who tax you to
> feed childreni (they "enslave you!), but not who tax you to sustain
> the army.
Oppressive taxation IS slavery, your moron.
Do you know what sparked the American Revolution?
a 0.5% tax on imported goods
ONE HALF OF ONE FUCKING PERCENT!
>
> You are a fully fledged hypocrite.
You're just upset because I showed that either
a) you are more interested in contradicting anything I say rather than truth,
OR
b) that sacrificing one's freedom is not worth *ANY* percieved benefit.
>
> >So, now, your reasons for arguing that Americans should sacrifice
> >their freedom is, what again, exactly?
>
> I don't consider all freedoms equally important. But just for
> kicks, what freedom do you imagine I am asking you to sacrifice?
>
> >> >> > I merely noted that the women who
> >> >> >live in one of the societies where that is the custom, have a much
> >> >> >*BETTER* life than what Feminism has given American women.
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, make up your mind: do you advocate what you believe is worse,
> >> >> or you advocate they should not leave the house alone?
> >> >
> >> >your mental masturbation is unbecoming.
> >>
> >> I know you prefer actual masturbation, but you have to wait
> >> until your mom looks the other way.
> >
> >Still raping your daughter, eh Roberto?
>
> What a witless comeback.
Roberto can dish it out, but can't take it.
Hypocritical fascist asshole.
>
> --
> Roberto Alsina
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:22:49 -0400
Roberto Alsina wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:04:12 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> >GAME
> >> >SET
> >> >MATCH
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >MORON.
> >>
> >> Nah, you have not won, and this is not tennis.
> >
> >GAME
> >SET
> >MATCH
> >
> >MORON.
>
> Again, Aaron, this is not tennis. And you should realize that the name
> said after "game set match" is the name of the WINNER. So, are you saying
> I am a moron and I won (what does that make you?) or are you saying YOU
> won, and you are a moron?
>
So, you're admitting that you just lost to a moron....
> --
> Roberto Alsina
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
