Philip Blundell wrote:
> >toolchain. Didn't fix the problem. I also tried compiling with -O1 and
> >various -fno-* switches to turn off individual optimizations to see which one
> >it might possibly be, but didn't find which one was the problem. Disabling
> >all optimizations with -O0 results in working binaries (albiet somewhat larger
> >and possibly slower). ???
>
> Using -O0 turns off all sorts of things that don't have specific -f flags; it
> really does inhibit pretty much all optimisation.
>
> p.
Hmm... Yes. Well, I have a head-scratcher for you now: I cross-compiled
glibc-2.2.2 for my ARM target (SA1110-based Accelent IDP), then proceeded to
bootstrap gcc-2.95.3 after installing binutils-2.11 so both would build natively.
This setup builds net-tools-1.60 just fine right out of the box, no tweaking of
anything. Wonder if I've stumbled onto another infamous Pentium-III bug?? ;)
--
Jeff Sutherland - Senior Engineer - http://www.accelent.com
- + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + -
Whenever I return from a trip abroad, I'm always amazed by two things: All
the wide open space we have in this country, and how bad the roads are.
m����+-���)�Ɗ�O�j)fj��b��?�)�Ū�>W����+m�曢��u���)ߢ���*'�{a��b�
