Philip Blundell wrote:
> >Interesting. The only reason I can think about is that a cross compiler
> >is a one stage build process, while a native compiler is a three stage
> >process. Like this:
>
> That would only make a difference if the compiler used for stage 1 was buggy.
> Seems unlikely that this is the case here, though I guess anything is possible.
>
> p.
I usually build and install a native compiler first, then use it to build itself
as a cross-compiler. Didn't do that this time as the native (2.95.2) compiler so
far has been solid and fairly recent enough that I thought I was OK. I think it
may be time to upgrade again- I'll give this a shot on Monday...
--
Jeff Sutherland - Senior Engineer - http://www.accelent.com
- + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + -
Whenever I return from a trip abroad, I'm always amazed by two things: All
the wide open space we have in this country, and how bad the roads are.
_______________________________________________
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
Please visit the above address for information on this list.
