On Feb 28, 2015, at 16:29 22, Len Ovens <l...@ovenwerks.net> wrote: > OSC is good because it is wide open... and bad because it is wide open. No > two applications seem to use OSC commands that are the same as another.
Right. It’s the ‘mechanism, but no policy’ conundrum all over again. I have no particular beef against OSC or OCA. However, there is already a small multitude of AoIP control protocols out there (Dante, JetNet, LiveWire, Q-Lan, WheatNet, …). I don’t think that adding Yet Another Incompatible Protocol is fundamentally going to improve this situation. What would be far more helpful would be a decent FOSS library for supporting one of the quasi-dominant AoIP systems; something that could help push that system over the top to make it the defacto industry standard. Today, in the pro audio/broadcasting space, there are really only two realistic contenders for this role: LiveWire or Ravenna. Pick one. Cheers! |----------------------------------------------------------------------| | Frederick F. Gleason, Jr. | Chief Developer | | | Paravel Systems | |----------------------------------------------------------------------| | It is computed that eleven thousand persons have at several times | | suffered death, rather than submit to break their eggs at the | | smaller end. | | -- Jonathan Swift | | "Gulliver's Travels" | |----------------------------------------------------------------------| _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
