https://github.com/audioscience/avdecc-lib
With AVB endpoints down to a few hundred bucks it seems the cost of entry is becoming acceptable... On Feb 28, 2015 2:57 PM, "Frederick Gleason" <fr...@paravelsystems.com> wrote: > On Feb 28, 2015, at 16:29 22, Len Ovens <l...@ovenwerks.net> wrote: > > > OSC is good because it is wide open... and bad because it is wide open. > No two applications seem to use OSC commands that are the same as another. > > Right. It’s the ‘mechanism, but no policy’ conundrum all over again. > > I have no particular beef against OSC or OCA. However, there is already a > small multitude of AoIP control protocols out there (Dante, JetNet, > LiveWire, Q-Lan, WheatNet, …). I don’t think that adding Yet Another > Incompatible Protocol is fundamentally going to improve this situation. > What would be far more helpful would be a decent FOSS library for > supporting one of the quasi-dominant AoIP systems; something that could > help push that system over the top to make it the defacto industry > standard. Today, in the pro audio/broadcasting space, there are really > only two realistic contenders for this role: LiveWire or Ravenna. Pick one. > > Cheers! > > > |----------------------------------------------------------------------| > | Frederick F. Gleason, Jr. | Chief Developer | > | | Paravel Systems | > |----------------------------------------------------------------------| > | It is computed that eleven thousand persons have at several times | > | suffered death, rather than submit to break their eggs at the | > | smaller end. | > | -- Jonathan Swift | > | "Gulliver's Travels" | > |----------------------------------------------------------------------| > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-dev mailing list > Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev >
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
