On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:23:11 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > I'd prefer "VST". There are dozens of useful plugins, hundreds of > developers with some knowledge of it, and demonstrated functionality > (albeit with some of the same problems as LADSPA, but signs of them > being fixed in the near-term future, and no strong evidence of any > deep harm caused by their presence).
VST has some advantages, but the licence situation is murky, its not /that/ great and I don't think we gain a lot by following it. - Steve
