On Mon, 20 Oct, 2003 at 01:19PM +0200, Mathias Lundgren spake thus: > Great, great, great! Thanks a lot! IMHO, documentation like this one is > definitely needed and something we're currently lacking. I've only skimmed > it, but I'm going to read it more thoroughly later on, since it's stuff I > need to read up on. > > That said, I'm a newbie on the subject, but I guess that makes me part of the > targeted audience for the tutorial. I think you're explaining things very > well. Of course, one can always look through code and find out what is going > on when learning about things like these, but it's much better to also get > the general idea of things before looking through the code. You're explaining > both concepts and give examples, and do both very well. Good job!
Thanks for the comments. Let me know if you have any suggestions for improvement. > /Mathias > > > > Hi, > > I've recently been learning to use JACK, and I had a look around for > > some kind of introductory article. I couldn't find one, so I wrote > > the tutorial I would have wanted, as I learnt. > > > > The tutorial is here: > > http://dis-dot-dat.net/jacktuts/starting/index.html > > > > Please have a look, make suggestions. Flames are fine, too. Let me > > know if I've made some huge error. Or maybe I'm not doing things > > the best way? Whatever, let me know. > > > > If this is well received, I'll write about more advanced topics as I > > get to them - mixing, the transport, threading without blocking the > > process callback, etc. > > > > I'll probably be asking a lot of questions later on, especially > > about best practise. > > > > Thanks peeps, > > > > James > >