On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:47:57PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Sep 27, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Zach Brown <z...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >>> 2) How may I tell btrfs to ignore all csums and just assume they are > >>> all correct? The reason for wanting this is in case the csum is > >>> garbled and the file is intact, or the csum is correct and the file is > >>> only partially garbled, but may still contain useful data. > >> > >> You can't, right now. There's discussion on IRC about this very > >> point right now. :) > > > > Well, hold on. Yes, you can't tell it to just not check checksums. > > > > But keep reading. It sounds like he thinks that *any* reads to the file > > will error once any checksum has failed. Surely that's not true, you > > can do use like dd conv=noerror and read all the extents of the file > > whose checksums are still valid. > > Would that get me an identically sized copy of the file, such as it is?
As far as I know, yes. - z -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
