On 4 August 2014 11:39, Hugo Mills <h...@carfax.org.uk> wrote:
>> >  * btrfs fi df
>> >     - look at metadata used vs total. If these are close to zero (on
>> >       3.15+) or close to 512 MiB (on <3.15), then you are in danger of
>> >       ENOSPC.
>>
>> Hmm. It's unfortunate that this could indicate an amount of space
>> which is free when it actually isn't.
>
>    That's why the 512 MiB block reserve was split out of metadata --
> so that you don't look at metadata and say "oh, I've got half a gig
> free, that's OK".

I don't quite follow this. Is it a recent development I missed? When
was it "split out"? More recently than the software I'm using?
Otherwise I'm having difficulty parsing this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to