On 2015-09-16 19:31, Hugo Mills wrote:
Yeah, maybe it's better to say that there's a directed graph of feature interdependence. I was just basing my statement on the presence of a list of project ideas on the wiki. :)On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:21:26PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:On 2015-09-16 12:45, Martin Tippmann wrote:2015-09-16 17:20 GMT+02:00 Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferro...@gmail.com>: [...][...]From reading the list I understand that btrfs is still very much work in progress and performance is not a top priority at this stage but I don't see why it shouldn't perform at least equally good as ZFS/F2FS on the same workloads. Is looking at performance problems on the development roadmap?Performance is on the roadmap, but the roadmap is notoriously short-sighted when it comes to time-frame for completion of something. You have to understand also that the focus in BTRFS has also been more on data safety than performance, because that's the intended niche, and the area most people look to ZFS for.Wait... there's a roadmap? ;)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
