On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 05:11:56PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > This type of change is more like a cleanup and you can find more > instances where the type is applied to just one of the operands, while > min_t/max_t would be better. Feel free to send a separate patch for > that.
Thanks for the feedback. I will try to do the sweep in the following days. I'm sorry, but I didn't quite understand. Should I resend the min/min_t change of this patch in a separate patch ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
