On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 07:28:46PM +0100, Seraphime Kirkovski wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 05:11:56PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > This type of change is more like a cleanup and you can find more > > instances where the type is applied to just one of the operands, while > > min_t/max_t would be better. Feel free to send a separate patch for > > that. > > Thanks for the feedback. I will try to do the sweep in the following > days. > > I'm sorry, but I didn't quite understand. Should I resend the min/min_t > change of this patch in a separate patch ?
Remove the hunk that changes min -> mit_t from this patch, send it in a separate patch with more changes of that kind. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
