On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 2:46 AM, Christophe de Dinechin <dinec...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 28 Apr 2017, at 22:09, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Christophe de Dinechin >> <dinec...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> QEMU qcow2. Host is BTRFS. Guests are BTRFS, LVM, Ext4, NTFS (winXP and >>> win10) and HFS+ (macOS Sierra). I think I had 7 VMs installed, planned to >>> restore another 8 from backups before my previous disk crash. I usually have >>> at least 2 running, often as many as 5 (fedora, ubuntu, winXP, win10, macOS) >>> to cover my software testing needs. >> >> That is quite a torture test for any file system but more so Btrfs. > > Sorry, but could you elaborate why it’s worse for btrfs?
Copy on write. Four of your five guests use non-cow filesystems, so any overwrite, think journal writes, are new extent writes in Btrfs. Nothing is overwritten in Btrfs. Only after the write completes are the stale extents released. So you get a lot of fragmentation, and all of these tasks you're doing become very metadata heavy workloads. However, what you're doing should work. The consequence should only be one of performance, not file system integrity. So your configuration is useful for testing and making Btrfs better. > >> How are the qcow2 files being created? > > In most cases, default qcow2 configuration as given by virt-manager. > >> What's the qemu-img create >> command? In particular i'm wondering if these qcow2 files are cow or >> nocow; if they're compressed by Btrfs; and how many fragments they >> have with filefrag. > > I suspect they are cow. I’ll check (on the other machine with a similar > setup) when I’m back home. Check the qcow2 files with filefrag and see how many extents they have. I'll bet they're massively fragmented. >> When I was using qcow2 for backing I used >> >> qemu-img create -f qcow2 -o preallocation=falloc,nocow=on,lazy_refcounts=on >> >> But then later I started using fallocated raw files with chattr +C >> applied. And these days I'm just using LVM thin volumes. The journaled >> file systems in a guest cause a ton of backing file fragmentation >> unless nocow is used on Btrfs. I've seen hundreds of thousands of >> extents for a single backing file for a Windows guest. > > Are there btrfs commands I could run on a read-only filesystem that would > give me this information? lsattr -- Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
