On 2018年05月18日 11:00, Liu Bo wrote:
> If parent_transid "0" is passed to btrfs_buffer_uptodate(),
> btrfs_buffer_uptodate() is equivalent to extent_buffer_uptodate(), but
> extent_buffer_uptodate() is preferred since we don't have to look into
> verify_parent_transid().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo....@linux.alibaba.com>

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <w...@suse.com>

And considering how little extra work we do in btrfs_buffer_uptodate(),
what about make it an inline function?

Thanks,
Qu

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> index 9fa3d77c98d4..a96d308c51b8 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> @@ -2445,7 +2445,7 @@ noinline void btrfs_unlock_up_safe(struct btrfs_path 
> *path, int level)
>                * and give up so that our caller doesn't loop forever
>                * on our EAGAINs.
>                */
> -             if (!btrfs_buffer_uptodate(tmp, 0, 0))
> +             if (!extent_buffer_uptodate(tmp))
>                       ret = -EIO;
>               free_extent_buffer(tmp);
>       } else {
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to