On 4/11/22 8:13 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Jeffle Xu <jeffl...@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> 
>> It is worth nothing that, ki->inval_counter is not initialized after
>> this cleanup.
> 
> I think you meant "It is worth noting that, ...".

Yeah...

> 
> Btw, is there a particular reason that you didn't want to pass in a pointer to
> a netfs_cache_resources struct?

IMHO, "struct netfs_cache_resources" is more like an interface for
netfs, while here __cachefiles_prepare_write() and __cachefiles_write()
are called inside Cachefiles module.

-- 
Thanks,
Jeffle

--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs

Reply via email to